
420-082
Christmas tree production in Virginia has steadily increased over the last several years. Favorable climate, soils, and proximity to markets place Virginia growers in a highly desirable marketing situation.
Christmas trees can be grown throughout the state, and growers are located in all regions. Selection of the proper species, however, is important. Soil conditions and general climate are the primary considerations influencing species selection, but other characteristics, such as consumer preference, species characteristics and requirements, condition of the planting site, and the presence or absence of pests, also play an important role.
Several species are normally planted for Christmas trees in Virginia. Table 1 lists the most commonly planted species by geographic region, while Table 2 lists characteristics for these and other species.
When selecting a species to plant for Christmas trees, it is important to consider characteristics, local growing conditions, handling/marketing requirements at harvest, seedling cost and availability, and market potential. Variation for many traits within a given species exists, particularly with color, needle length, growth rate, and form. Thus, seed or seedling source can be an important consideration, and many species are divided into recognized varieties based on seed collected from different geographic areas. For instance, there are at least 15 different seed sources for Scotch pine used in Christmas tree production, each exhibiting different characteristics.
A native of the mountains of Virginia, white pine is also found east of the mountains at lower elevations. It has a pleasing silver-green color, soft needles, and good needle retention. It is a fast-growing tree on average to good sites, requiring heavy pruning to produce a compact, symmetrical tree. White pine grows best on moist, well-drained sandy loam soils, preferably on northeast, east, or southeast slopes, and can be planted throughout the state. On the average, approximately six to eight years are required to produce a 6-foot tree.
White pine is the most widely planted Christmas tree species in Virginia. Seedlings can be obtained from commercial nurseries, primarily in the Lake and New England states, or from the Virginia Department of Forestry. The VDOF obtains its seed from Floyd and Carroll Counties, and in recent years has produced a special Christmas tree grade of white pine seedlings.
Figure 1. White pine (Pinus strobus).
Figure 2. Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris).
Figure 3. Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana).
Fraser fir is very similar in form and appearance to balsam fir, a widely distributed northern species. Needles are flat, 1/2 inch to 1 inch long, green above and silver beneath. Fraser fir is native to the Appalachian Mountains at elevations of 4,000 to 6,000 feet in western North Carolina, eastern Tennessee, and southwestern Virginia. At lower elevations, planting sites for Fraser fir should be carefully selected. The recommended minimum elevation in Virginia for planting Fraser fir is 2,000 feet, although vigorous plantations have been established as low as 1,500 to 1,700 feet. Lower elevations can be partly compensated for by such factors as frequent summer showers, northern exposure, and moist sites. The soil for this species should be moderately acid (pH of about 5.3 to 5.8), have some organic matter, and have a moderate water-holding capacity.
Fraser fir has excellent color and needle retention, pleasing fragrance, and strong branches with a slight turn-up which gives the tree a compact appearance.
Fraser fir is recommended for the mountain counties at higher elevations on northern to northeast slopes in areas of high rainfall. There is some evidence of susceptibility to late spring frosts. No significant growth differences due to seed origin have been observed. Large transplant stock should be used if available. On good sites, Fraser fir should reach a height of 6 feet in seven to ten years after planting.
Of the pests attacking Fraser fir, Phytophthora root rot can be particularly damaging, but can be avoided by not planting on poorly drained soils and sites.
Figure 4. Fraser fir (Abies fraseri).
White fir is native to the western United States and could have potential as an alternative species for Virginia growers. Needles are long, 1 1/2 inches to 2 1/2 inches, silvery-blue in color, and curve upwards along the twig. White fir grows more slowly than the pines or some of the other fir species, requiring nine to twelve or more years to produce 7-foot Christmas trees.
Stock from several different sources is available, but experienced growers in Michigan prefer stock originating from central Arizona because of faster growth, lower susceptibility to cold damage, and bluer color than stock from other sources. White fir is apparently susceptible to late spring frosts, and therefore it requires sites with good air drainage.
Figure 5. White fir (Abies concolor).
Figure 6. Norway spruce (Picea abies).
Figure 7. Blue spruce (Picea pungens).
Douglas fir is not a true fir, nor has it been widely tried or marketed as a Christmas tree by Virginia growers. Native to the Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States, it is considered by many in the west and north to be a premium Christmas tree species and has been widely planted in those regions. Douglas fir is similar in growth form and appearance to the spruces. The needles are short (3/4 inch to 1 1/4 inches) and flattened, dark green above and paler green on the underside, are borne singly along slender twigs, and remain strongly attached after cutting. Terminal buds are a very prominent reddish brown.
Northern and western growers have found that Douglas fir can be developed into a high-quality Christmas tree on the proper site using proper seed or seed origin. For best growth, upland sites with well-drained loam or sandy loam soils are recommended on north- and east-facing slopes with good air drainage to avoid late spring frost injury. Stock from sources in Arizona and New Mexico are reported to grow the fastest and have dark green foliage, while sources in northern Idaho and adjacent British Columbia supposedly grow as fast with less frost susceptibility. Rotations with stock from these sources have been reported to be seven to nine years.
Douglas fir needs to be studied more closely in Virginia before it can be widely recommended to Virginia growers for Christmas tree production. Strains need to be evaluated for variability, frost susceptibility, and growth. With Virginia's climate and the proper seedling stock, a five-year rotation should be possible.
Figure 8. Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii).
The recommendations or discussions of species in this publication for selecting species for Christmas tree production do not preclude the use of other species. In fact, almost every conifer can be developed into a reasonably attractive Christmas tree, though not necessarily on a commercial level. Large-scale production of Christmas trees, however, will be most successful and profitable if species with proven track records for production and marketing are selected. The species discussed in this publication either have been successfully marketed as Christmas trees in Virginia or are being examined for potential use in Virginia.
White pine and Scotch pine are the two most widely planted species in Virginia because of their wide adaptability and marketability. Growers considering species that have not been widely planted or tested for Christmas tree production in Virginia should seek advice concerning the species and site before planting.
This publication is a revision of VCE Publication 420-082, Recommended Species for Christmas Tree Planting in Virginia (1983), by former Extension Forester Thomas J. Nichols.
Reviewed by Kyle Peer, Superintendent, Reynolds Homestead Forest Resources Research Center
Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, re-print, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Alan L. Grant, Dean, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Edwin J. Jones, Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Jewel E. Hairston, Interim Administrator,1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg.
May 1, 2009