
420-136
Forestland can provide countless hours of recreational benefits as well as an important source of income. Many landowners take careful steps to ensure that their property is managed to maximize the benefits they receive. However, all of this work can be easily eradicated by one of Virginia’s most dreaded forest pests: timber thieves.
Thanks to high timber prices, timber theft is an attractive crime. It is not only highly profitable for thieves, but it is also difficult to catch and convict them. Because efforts to stop thieves have been so unsuccessful, there has been very little publicity about the crime itself. As a result, many private landowners do not realize that timber theft is a severe problem which could affect their landholdings.
Either of these thefts, though, can easily ruin the value of a timber stand and quickly undermine any management plans which may have been prepared.
Criminal Remedies
While the act of stealing another’s property typically constitutes larceny, in timber theft cases, where it is likely that the value of the stolen property is greater than $200, the crime represents the felony of grand larceny. A thief convicted of this crime faces a fine of up to $2,500, one to 20 years in prison, paying restitution for the value of the stolen timber, or any combination of these three penalties.
This is by far the stiffest penalty that can be pursued in a timber theft case. Recent changes in timber theft law have increased the likelihood of a grand larceny conviction. The landowner only needs to prove that trespass occurred, and then the burden of proving the timber removal was inadvertent or under some claim of legal right falls to the defendant.
Experienced timber estimators working for both the landowner and the defendant determine the damages of the timber theft. A third-party estimator can be brought in if an agreement cannot be reached as to the value of the lost timber. Restitution for the lost timber includes three times the timber stumpage value, reforestation costs (not exceeding $450 per acre), and payment of legal fees and estimator costs.Civil Remedies
Many victims turn to civil court when they seek remedy for their loss because the burden of proof is lower than in criminal court. In a successful civil case, the landowner may be legally entitled to restitution similar to what can be ordered by a criminal court after a conviction. The actual results depend heavily on the facts of the trespass. There is, of course, no guarantee that a landowner will win a civil lawsuit. In that case, the landowner recovers nothing.
Even if the landowner wins the civil case and is awarded money from the trespasser, it is the landowner’s responsibility to try and collect that money. This can be a formidable task, because the individuals perpetrating these crimes have often spent any money long before they are ordered to pay restitution, making them essentially judgment proof. They may also be accomplished thieves and know all the tricks for sheltering money acquired by nefarious means. Additionally, the legal costs of bringing a civil lawsuit must initially be borne by the landowner. Thus, in Virginia, the landowner can be at a distinct disadvantage in civil cases.
Theft will occasionally be perpetrated by individuals looking to steal one high-value log. Unless the property is located away from roads, this type of theft is extremely difficult to prevent. Often though, a theft or trespass will occur when adjoining landowners are harvesting timber. The vast majority of timber harvesters are business people trying to make an honest living. Regrettably, as in any industry, there are the exceptions. Therefore, it is critical that landowners take precautions to try and prevent theft from occurring.
While prevention is the approach most landowners would like to take, with a crime of this nature, it is essentially impossible to make property theft-proof. Should the worst happen and you discover a theft has occurred, it is critical to report it to the proper authorities. Contact either the state police or the county sheriff. The scene must be examined and the incident recorded if there is to be any only hope of pursuing a criminal prosecution.
It is wise to contact a professional consulting forester as well. Often, these individuals have experience with timber theft cases, and may be able to assist you. If the amount of timber stolen is large, a consulting forester will be needed to provide an estimate of the monetary value of the missing timber. The Virginia Department of Forestry will be able to provide a list of consulting foresters who can do this sort of work.
An additional incentive for you to determine the estimated value of the stolen timber is for tax purposes. Often, taxable land values include the value of the timber on the property. In the case of a timber theft, therefore, the lost value can be deducted from your taxes as a casualty loss (for more information see http://www. timbertax.org/). While this is not a remedy, it is an important step to take to ensure that even more money isn’t lost to inflated taxes.
Finally, if a thief or trespasser can be identified, trying to negotiate a settlement with them may be a better approach than pursuing legal remedies. If it is possible to persuade them to pay a reasonable sum of money without going through the burden of a court case, this is certainly a preferable alternative to a trial. Legal cases can be long and expensive ordeals, and the outcome can be highly unpredictable.
Virginia Department of Forestry
(434) 977-6555
http://www.dof.virginia.gov/
Virginia Forestry Association
(804) 278-8733
http://www.vaforestry.org/
Virginia Tech Forest Landowner Education Program
(540) 231-6391
http://www.cnr.vt.edu/forestupdate/
Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, re-print, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Alan L. Grant, Dean, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Edwin J. Jones, Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Jewel E. Hairston, Administrator, 1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg.
May 1, 2009