The nursery industry in Virginia has enjoyed an extended period of growth and expansion. Consequently, there is considerable interest in and some potential for new business opportunities in the industry. Another consequence of this period of economic growth is an increase in competition within the industry to supply the growing demand for landscape plants. Those interested in getting into the nursery business are strongly encouraged to invest their time and energy into learning as much as they can about the modern nursery industry, and the many options now available in nursery production, before they invest any money in facilities and operations.
Virginia's nursery industry has many more production options available today than when it began in the United States during the 1700's. The first trees produced were bareroot fruit trees, progressing to bareroot shade trees, and later to field-grown, balled-in-burlap (B&B) harvested trees. The container nursery industry started at the end of World War II with the production of small trees and a variety of shrubs in #10 metal fruit cans. The industry has now progressed to growing an extremely diverse number of annuals, herbaceous perennials, vines, ground covers, ornamental grasses, shrubs and trees. In particular, trees can be grown to much larger sizes in field production with the use of mechanical harvesting equipment (tree spades), and in wood and plastic containers of sizes of 200 gallons or larger.
In deciding whether to grow nursery stock in the field vs. containers, many factors should be considered relative to nursery design and capitalization. Some of these factors are summarized in the table below.
|Table 1. Considerations for field versus container nurseries.|
|Field (in-ground) nursery||Container nursery||Notes|
|Land area required||Larger||Smaller||Relative to profitability of operation|
|Number of employees||1 per 5 10 acres||1 per acre||Field production has more seasonal employees|
|Economic return per acre||Lesser with fewer plants per acre and longer production cycle||Greater with more plants per acre and realized sooner|
|Production cycle||Longer (1 6+ years)||Shorter (6 months 2 + years)|
|Production costs per acre||Lesser costs for site preparation, labor and maintenance||Greater investment in production area construction, containers, water, substrate, and larger labor force|
|Intensity of management||Lower fertilization and irrigation requirements; mowing of fallow strips and weed control in planting rows||Daily irrigation; monitoring for blowover, weed control, rate of disease or insect spread, and protection from temperature extremes|
|Seasonality||Periodic with limited harvest during periods of active growth||Year-round||Both types of production have some down time in winter|
|Types and sizes of plants||Preferred production system for large caliper trees; limited holding time after harvest||More efficient production of small shrubs, annuals and perennials; plants can be repotted to larger containers if not sold||Recent hybrid production systems allow larger plant sizes in containers|
|Growing area preparation and maintenance||Generally less required. Unique concerns for removal of acreage from production for soil rebuilding, and replacement of soil removed by B&B harvesting||More extensive and expensive site preparation for drainage and water recycling. Container beds require a gravel, plastic or fabric covering||Important part of Best Management Practices (BMPs)|
|Irrigation||Irrigation not mandatory; irrigating will help establish liners and produce faster growth||Daily irrigation mandatory; 27,000 gallons per acre per day capacity recommended during peak production months||Both production systems can use drip or overhead irrigation; important part of BMPs|
|Fertilizer use and application||Less fertilizer per acre; usually broadcast applied; less labor intensive||Fertilizer topdressed by hand is labor intensive; substrate-incorporated fertilizer less labor intensive, but requires special equipment||Either system via irrigation (fertigation), with special injection equipment; controlled-release fertilizers recommended for both production systems; important part of BMPs|
|Weed control||Mechanical weed control via cultivation or hoeing in addition to chemical (herbicide) options||More difficult dueclose plant spacing, favorable weed growth environment, weed seed introduction via irrigation and substrate, andbstrate buffering capacity against herbicide application errors; hand weeding and herbicide application are available||Weed control around producation areas will help reduce weed pressure; important part of BMPs|
|Disease and insect control||Somewhat less intensive; larger plants require specialized equipment for pesticide delivery||More intensive due to greater insect and disease pressure; more difficult control applications due to higher plant densities and reduced air circulation||Regular monitoring or scouting will reduce problems in either system; important part of BMPs|
|Summer stress||Irrigation important to avoid drought; less concern for heat stress||Greater summer heat stress due to high root zone temperatures in containers, and heat produced or reflected from container beds; may use shade structures or syringing (short cycle overhead irrigation)|
|Overwintering||Little protection is generally required||From simply jamming containers together to protecting plants in heated overwintering structures|
|Harvesting||Restricted to seasons when soil moisture is adequate and plants are dormant; plants are dug by hand or machine, bareroot or with soil ball; root protection required during holding (cold storage, heeling in, balling-in-burlap)||Any time by simply loading plants from their production beds||Improvements in irrigation and postharvest handling have allowed somesummer digging of field grown plants|
|Shipping||Bareroot field-grown plants can be bundled or boxed, large B&B plants spaced on trucks or tied to individual pallets||Containers can be stacked can-on-can, boxed or racked; lighter weight reduces shipping costs||Long distance shipping is possible for container-grown plants, but cost prohibitive for field grown B&B|
|Equipment needs||Requires more expensive machine-harvesting equipment; may require larger irrigation and spray equipment||Production efficiency requires substrate mixing and container filling equipment.|
|Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages of field versus container nurseries.|
|Advantages||Field (in-ground) nursery ||Container nursery |
Conventional B&B - Shrubs and trees that are dug with a portion of their roots covered with a ball of soil are called balled-and-burlapped or balled-in-burlap (B&B) plants. B&B is the next step up from bare root harvest, and can be used for evergreen as well as deciduous plants, and for much larger plants than are harvested bare root. Most B&B harvesting, as with bare root, is done while plants are dormant, but recent improvements in holding and acclimating techniques (ways to prevent balls from drying out and ways to stimulate summer root growth) have allowed increased digging during the growing season. Some landscapers prefer to transplant B&B plants as opposed to container-grown plants to avoid some of the soil interface problems that develop when plants are container-grown in soilless substrate. B&B plants are heavy and awkward to handle. Hand harvesting requires trained staff, and mechanical harvesting requires hydraulic tree spades and other equipment.
Holding/marketing options - Bare root plants can be held in cold storage with their roots exposed or packed in damp moss or other material; they can also be process (or peat) balled where their roots are surrounded by organic matter that is then packaged to look like a root ball; they can also be containerized or potted in a container with soilless substrate. There are also many new (and largely untested) products that may reduce dessication of bare root plants during storage. These products may be root dips, gels, or clay products designed to maintain a high moisture environment around roots. Some field plants dug with a soil ball are put in containers instead of being burlapped (field potted - roses, azaleas), while some B&B plants, with fully burlapped root balls, are also containerized.
Engineered containers - To help reduce or eliminate the problem of circling roots that often develop in smooth or slick walled plastic containers, a variety of containers have been designed that deflect or redirect roots via molded container wall baffles, or that kill root tips when roots encounter holes in the container walls (air root pruning). If conventional containers must be used, those with vertical ribs help reduce circling roots vs. those with horizontal ribs that encourage circling root formation. Soft-walled poly bag containers with gusseted bottoms are also a good solution to this problem.
Copper-coated containers and copper inserts - A copper-containing product has been developed (Spinout®) that can be applied to smooth container walls to reduce or eliminate root circling. The copper acts as a growth regulator, stunting the root tips as opposed to redirecting or killing them. Effective for one growing season in the container, normal root growth resumes when the container is removed and the plant transplanted into the landscape.
Low-profile container/The Accelerator® - The low profile container is a bottomless container that sits on plastic or woven ground cloth. It is wider and more shallow than conventional containers to encourage development of a shallow, broad root system that more closely mirrors natural root systems. Root circling is reduced in low-profile containers by air-root pruning at the container wall/plastic bed covering interface. Root circling is reduced in the commercially available The Accelerator® via holes in and corrugations of the aluminum container wall.
AGS - The Above Ground System (AGS) is a double container system for use above ground. A production container nests in a double-walled holder container that serves to insulate the plant's roots and buffer high and low temperature extremes. The AGS can have ballast added to prevent blow over, and is easier to harvest than the in-ground, double container (Pot-in-pot) system .
Hybrid Systems - Several "hybrid" production systems, combining advantages of field production with advantages of container production, have been developed. Most of these systems attempt to do one or more of the following: harvest more absorbing roots, prevent root deformation, keep root temperatures buffered, conserve moisture, prevent blow-over, increase ease of harvest, and reduce labor use.
In-ground fabric containers (grow bags) - In-ground fabric containers are made from porous synthetic fabrics (usually polypropylene). They permit exchange of moisture between in-container soil and the surrounding soil while preventing some or all of the plant's roots from growing outside the container. The earliest versions of the fabric containers were often difficult to remove at transplant due to large root penetration or root entanglement in the fabric's fibers. Fabric containers are now easier to remove due to fabric improvements, or the use of fabrics with small holes, copper impregnation, or a herbicide delivery system. Due to root restriction within the fabric container, drip irrigation is essential with fabric containers. Fabric containers are often removed prior to sale and the root balls containerized to assure that roots will not be restricted by non- removal of the fabric container when the plant is transplanted.
Pot-in-pot (P&P) - This system uses two containers - a production container nested inside the holder (sleeve or stock or "socket") container, both sunk into the ground. This method of production has expanded rapidly in recent years. It has allowed predominantly container nursery operations to grow larger nursery stock, while still maintaining tight controls over irrigation, fertilization and other cultural practices of container production. Drainage of these in-ground pots is crucial and generally maintained by the placement of corrugated drain pipes beneath the rows of socket pots.
Some form of micro-irrigation (drip or spray emitter) is necessary in this production method to avoid tremendous inefficiency in water delivery with overhead sprinklers when large containers are spaced far apart. Pot-in-pot production also buffers root zone temperatures from extremes and reduces blow over of larger, top-heavy trees because the containers are anchored in the ground.
Cellugro® System - This is a multiple plant production system for small plants and liners. Two sizes of Cellugro systems are available. One measures 8'x20' and holds 561 six-quart-sized (one gallon plus) plants, while the other holds 7 gallon plants. Both systems consist of a polyliner, a drainboard, and the expandable production cell unit. The system is installed either into the ground (approximately 8 inches deep) or set above ground with soil bermed around it. Not only are root temperatures buffered, but water consumption is dramatically reduced compared to above ground containers.
Container Production - Site selection is less critical for container production. A container production bed can be built atop any soil type as long as drainage off the bed is achieved by way of a moderate natural slope or grading. Drainage is also important for the roadways between the beds so that vehicles and equipment have access year-round. Soil fertility level and pH are of no concern as they are for field production.
Container Production - When preparing container production areas, there are three main parts to plan - the actual production beds, the irrigation and excess water collection system, and the roads. How much grading is needed will depend upon the land's slope, the type of irrigation and drainage system to be used, the rate of percolation of heavy rain into the soil, and the type of bed covering to be used. If an impervious covering such as black plastic (poly or polyethylene) will be used, grading must drain all water off the bed. If gravel, clam shells or woven nursery cloth will be used, water must either drain through the soil beneath quickly enough that it does not puddle, or the ground should be graded.
A goal of all nurseries should be to catch and recycle all excess water (irrigation and rain). This may require construction of a drainage system and holding ponds. Some drainage systems are designed as part of the container beds, while others may be part of the roads.
Once general bed and drainage grading is complete, and any irrigation or catch ponds constructed, the soil should be stabilized to support equipment and prevent erosion. The soil may need sterilizing or treatment with herbicides to deal with weed problems. Materials (gravel, clam shells) may need to be applied for road beds. If irrigation will use buried lines, these should be installed before the container beds are constructed.
Container bed dimensions will depend on several factors: container sizes to be used; initial spacing and respacing requirements; cultural requirements (do you need to walk between containers to topdress fertilizer, or to hand weed); irrigation design and coverage; weight of growing substrate. Solid set irrigation allows less flexibility in bed dimensions than drip irrigation.
Container Production - All container-grown plants must be fertilized since very few nutrients are available from the production substrate. Fertilizer may either be a dry, slow release granular material or a liquid, and is generally a complete fertilizer (N-P-K) plus micronutrients. The dry granular materials can be applied either by incorporation into the production substrate prior to potting, can be placed or "dibbled" into the bottom of the planting hole, or can be "topdressed" or applied to the substrate surface. No one placement method has been found to be superior for all container-grown plants. Water soluble fertilizer is generally applied via the irrigation system, with many nurseries using a combination of dry and water soluble fertilizers.
In addition to a complete fertilizer plus micronutrients, additional phosphorus is often added, as well as lime to increase the pH or to provide an additional source of calcium and magnesium. Most granular fertilizers do not last an entire growing season and need to be reapplied around midsummer.
The use of controlled-release fertilizers (CRFs) has largely replaced the use of traditional granular fertilizers in nursery production. These products package nutrient salts in "capsules" of resin or polymer coating. The coating "controls" the release of nutrient salts via moisture content or temperature of the substrate. CRFs are available in several formulations to suit the nutrient requirements of different plants, and also are available with different coatings to provide nutrient release over different time frames (e.g. 4 month vs 12 month formulations). These products generally provide more consistent nutrient availability to plants over time than traditional granular fertilizers.
Regardless of the fertilizer source and formulation, regular analysis of the nutrient status of the production substrate is recommended in order to make adjustments before plant problems develop. An easy method to use, which was developed at Virginia Tech, is the "pour through" method. Details of the pour-through method of monitoring nutrients in containers will be addressed in a future Virginia Cooperative Extension publication, are available in Wright (1986, see references), and can be accessed through the web at: http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/hort/nursery/cultural/topic4.htm
Container Production - Irrigation is mandatory for container production, with irrigation often being applied daily during the growing season. It is generally recommended that 1 acre-inch, or 27,000 gallons of water, be maintained in storage for each acre of land under container production. While less than 1 inch per acre per day may be applied to container crops, the additional volume of water in storage is insurance for periods of excessive heat and drought, and to ensure irrigation water quality. Irrigation may be applied overhead, by drip or trickle systems, or by subsurface or capillary systems. Overhead irrigation uses the greatest volume of water while subsurface (rare in the U.S.) uses the least. A large volume of high quality water (low in salts, slightly acid pH, free of weed seeds, sediment, iron, etc.) must be available, and at a rate that allows daily or every other day irrigation. If water is not applied daily a "heavier" substrate (one with sand to create smaller water-holding pore spaces) is generally necessary. If irrigation runoff and rainwater is collected and recycled, the water may need chemical treatment to prevent disease problems. A new means of applying water overhead involves "pulse" irrigation involving several applications of smaller quanities of water per application. Pulsed irrigation uses less water and leaches less fertilizer.
Container Production - Weeds are far more difficult to control in container production than in field production due to close plant spacing and the fact that only hand weeding, substrate weed barriers, and herbicides can be used. It is very important that weed-free substrate, water and liners be used, and that weeds be controlled under and around all production beds.
Container Production - Other important considerations in container production include liner sources, container types, sources and disposal, substrate sources, components and mixing/potting equipment, blow-over of containers/plants, sun protection of some plants during the summer (via trees, shade structures or extra irrigation), cold and wind protection of some plants during the winter (via straw, synthetic coverings, overwintering structures), pruning, control of insects and diseases; and container moving and shipping systems.
BMP's - The nursery industry, in order to be a good steward of the environment, has been developing a set of production guidelines know as Best Management Practices (BMPs). The Southern Nursery Association, in collaboration with regional research universities and the Environmental Protection Agency, published "Best Management Practices, Guide for Producing Container-Grown Plants" which outlines important environmental considerations of container nurseries (see references). BMPs include:
Propagation references -
Plant Propagation, Principles and Practices (6th edition) by Hudson Hartmann, Dale Kester and Fred Davies, Jr. 1997. Prentice Hall.
Seeds of Woody Plants in North America by James Young and Cheryl Young. (Formerly USDA Forest Service Ag. Handbook 450) 1992. Dioscorides Press
The Reference Manual of Woody Plant Propagation by Michael Dirr and Charles Heuser. 1987. Varsity Press, Inc.
Nursery design and production references -
American Standard for Nursery Stock. 1996. American Association of Nurserymen.
Container Nursery Design by Bonnie Lee Appleton. 1986. American Nurseryman Publishing Company, Inc.
Best Management Practices, Guide for Producing Container-Grown Plants by Tom Yeager, Donna Fare, Charles Gilliam, Alex Niemiera, Ted Bilderback, and Ken Tilt, 1997. Southern Nurserymen's Association.
Nursery Management (3rd edition) by Harold Davidson, Roy Mecklenburg and Curtis Peterson. 1994. Prentice Hall.
Nursery Production (2nd edition) edited by Charles Heuser and Richard Stinson. 1989. Dept. of Ag. and Ext. Educ. Vol. 28, No. 1T and 1S, Penn State University.
Nursery Production Alternatives for Reduction or Elimination of Circling Tree Roots. Bonnie Appleton. 1993. Journal of Arboriculture 19(6):383-388.
Nursery Production Methods for Improving Tree Roots - An Update. Bonnie Appleton. 1995. Journal of Arboriculture 21(6):265-270.
Plant Production in Containers by Carl Whitcomb. 1984. Lacebark Publications Inc.
Production of Landscape Plants II (in the field). by Carl Whitcomb. 2001. Lacebark Publications, Inc.
The pour-through nutrient extraction procedure. Robert D. Wright. 1986. HortScience 21:227-229.
Trade publications -
American Nurseryman, 77 W. Washington Street, Suite 2100, Chicago, IL 60602-2904 1-800-621-5727; 312-782-5505; published semimonthly (24 issues per year) - fee.
NMPro (Nursery Management & Production), PO Box 1868, Fort Worth, TX 76101 1-800-946-6776; 817-882-4120; published monthly (12 issues per year) - free.
Commercial products are named in this publication for informational purposes only. Virginia Cooperative Extension does not endorse these products and does not intend discrimination against other products which also may be suitable.
Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, re-print, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Alan L. Grant, Dean, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Edwin J. Jones, Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Jewel E. Hairston, Administrator, 1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg.
May 1, 2009