
442-306
Animal manure has been used for centuries as a fertilizer and a soil builder because it contains nutrients and organic matter. However, as animal production shifts toward fewer but larger operations, the number of confined animals has increased in some geographical locations, resulting in more manure produced than can be assimilated by the available farmland where the animals are raised. If manure is not managed properly, the potential for air, water, and soil pollution become environmental concerns. One way to avoid the negative environmental impacts of manure nutrients is through treatment prior to land application.
This publication is meant to help those who are considering the installation or upgrade of manure-treatment systems or technologies on their farms. It provides an overview of the basic principles underlying manure-treatment systems and includes some questions to ask technology providers in order to make an informed selection of appropriate farm technology.
To evaluate whether you need to treat manure produced on your farm, questions to consider include:
Treating manure can result in:
Several treatment technologies are available in the open market, and vendors and environmental groups are recommending the use of some of these technologies. Regardless of their names, these technologies use a physical, chemical, or biological process – or a combination of these processes – to treat manure. Therefore, if you have an understanding of the processes, you should be able to understand how the treatment technologies work.
Some of these technologies have been investigated or evaluated by organizations, including government agencies, universities, corporations, and farmers, to test their suitability for use on farms. In general, manure-treatment technologies – or alternative technologies, as they are referred to at times – are evaluated or selected based on their ability to provide the required protection of soil, water, and air resources, i.e., their effectiveness in reducing odors, gaseous emissions, and pathogens and in managing nutrients from animal-feeding operations. In some cases, the treatment or alternative technologies can address several of these requirements, while some address only individual resources or waste constituents. However, long-term success of the treatment systems is still in question. There are concerns about affordability, effectiveness, and long-term environmental and social impacts associated with some of these treatment technologies.
The basic principles underlying manure-treatment systems or technologies can be grouped into: physical, chemical, and biological processes. Manure-treatment technologies typically include one or a combination of these basic processes.
The treatment of manure or wastewater can happen by or through application of physical forces. Physical processes include those technologies that involve liquid-solids separation and/or the use of heat and pressure. Liquid-solids separation can be achieved through settling (sedimentation) or by using mechanical methods (e.g., use of screens, centrifuges, or belt presses). Advantages of liquid-solids separation include concentration of solids for separate treatment or reuse, reduction of solids that can settle before treating and storing manure in lagoons, and prevention of clogging of manure pipes. In combination with chemicals, liquid -solids separation can be used to remove nutrients from manure. Other physical methods include drying, incineration, pyrolysis, combustion, and gasification.
|
|
|
|
Figure 1. Examples of manure separators used in liquid-manure handling
Principal chemical processes for wastewater include chemical coagulation, chemical precipitation, chemical disinfection, chemical oxidation, chemical neutralization, chemical stabilization, and ion exchange. Chemicals, in conjunction with physical processes, can be used to remove nitrogen, phosphorus, and heavy metals. Chemicals have also been used to control odors and pH and to remove organic compounds. It should be noted that adding chemicals means adding external material into the manure-treatment system that is not generated on the farm, thereby increasing the volume of the waste stream to be handled after treatment.
|
|
| |
Figure 2. Chemical application to manure in storage tanks for phosphorus removal; struvite recovery reactor from manure to recover phosphorus
Biological-treatment systems or processes are designed to oxidize dissolved and particulate biodegradable constituents of manure into acceptable end products, and to transform or remove nitrogen and phosphorus. With proper environmental controls, all wastewater containing biodegradable constituents can be treated biologically. Biological processes make use of naturally occurring microorganisms to degrade manure in the presence of oxygen (aerobic) or absence of oxygen (anaerobic). It is important that the characteristics of each biological process be understood to operate biological-treatment-based technologies efficiently.
In aerobic processes-based technologies, oxygen is provided to the manure so that microorganisms can:
Depending on the technology, air can be supplied using bubble or surface aerators. Thus, the success of aeration-based technologies depends on the survival of aerobic microorganisms.
Anaerobic-treatment processes occur naturally in soils or in engineered systems, such as reactors or landfills, in environments where there is no oxygen. The major benefits of anaerobic digestion are reduced COD or BOD and solids; production of methane gas – a potential energy source; less energy required compared to aerobic processes; and less biological-sludge production compared to aerobic processes. Anaerobic digestion does not reduce manure’s nitrogen and phosphorus content, and has the potential of producing odor and corrosive gases.
|
|
| |
Figure 3. Full-scale manure-treatment technologies on farms using manure separation and aeration
The first step in selecting a manure-treatment system or technology is a clear assessment of the problem that the treatment system is intended to correct. Some examples of the problems may be excess nutrients for the land available on the farm, odor impacts on neighbors, manure storage capacity issues, complying with the nutrient management plan, and changes in regulations requiring change in manure management. Use of the county Extension service and consultants in manure management may be helpful in identifying the problem if the farmer is not fully knowledgeable in the subject matter. Also, it is important to identify the primary source of the problem. For example, if an odor problem exists, is the source of the odor the barn, the manure storage pit, land application of manure, or a combination of these activities? Covering the manure storage pit may not be the solution if the manure pit is not the source.
Secondly, it is important to understand how the treatment system works, and base selection on the ability of the technology to meet the objectives determined in the first step, i.e., provide protection to soil, water, and air quality.
Thirdly, before proceeding to select a new manure-treatment technology, consider all the options available for addressing the problem identified. Options may include changing the diet fed to animals; changing the way manure is handled and managed on the farm; increasing land area for manure application; or planting trees to create visual buffers and alter air patterns (if odor is the problem), as well as to enhance the aesthetic perception of the farming operation. Remember that some manure-treatment systems address several concerns, while others are very specialized, addressing only individual manure constituents.
|
|
|
|
| |
Figure 4. Manure-treatment options showing aerated ponds, lagoons, manure storage tanks, and solid-manure storage structure
In general, base selection of a manure-treatment system or technology on economics, engineering, regulation, and public reaction as they affect your operation. Some questions that may be helpful in selecting a technology are presented below:
There is no single technology that is the “best.” Each technology and its components have advantages and disadvantages. The best manure-treatment technology depends on personal preferences, available capital and labor, waste sources, soil type, cropping practices, skills needed to use the technology, and a number of other factors. Therefore, in making a selection, evaluate the need for a manure-treatment technology very objectively based on current challenges and planned expansions on the farm.
Also, consider the growth and changes in the community surrounding the farm; for example, how close your neighbors and streams or watercourses are to your livestock center. Other issues to consider include climatic conditions and weather patterns, water-pollution potential, and how changes in regulations governing manure use affect the operation.
When changing, expanding, remodeling, or rebuilding an operation, consider alternative or management options that are more efficient and cost effective, e.g., different kinds of housing, various types of handling equipment, and disposal alternatives. Note that a new technology may require changes in manure handling and equipment.
To make a change worthwhile, processes need to be cost effective, labor efficient, environmentally friendly, and reliable year-round. Thus, the technology will be valuable if it improves the efficiency and productivity of the operation and if the environmental benefits derived from the technology equal or exceed the technology’s installation and operation costs.
It is also important to verify performance claims made by technology providers. Ask for data and an explanation of how the claims of the percentage removals or reductions were calculated. Make sure that calculations meet the goals previously established for the technology. Data to support the performance of the technology must be collected within appropriate ranges of key operating parameters, such as feed rate, feed characteristics, temperature, reagent dosages, hydraulic-loading rates, etc. It is important to know the operating conditions and typical ranges that are representative of the process, because these must be stated in the performance claim. A verified claim is only valid if the technology is operated within the operating conditions stated in the performance claim.
Aerobic process: Biological-treatment process that occurs in the presence of oxygen.
Anaerobic process: Biological-treatment process that occurs in the absence of oxygen.
BOD: Biochemical oxygen demand is the rate at which microorganisms use oxygen in water or wastewater while stabilizing decomposable organic matter under aerobic conditions. During the decomposition process, the organic matter serves as food for bacteria. BOD is used as a measure of the organic strength of a wastewater.
Coagulation: The clumping together of very fine particles into larger particles, caused by using chemicals (coagulants). The chemicals neutralize the electrical charges of the fine particles, allowing them to come close together and form larger clumps. The clumping makes it easier to separate the solids from a liquid stream by settling, filtering, or decanting.
COD: Chemical oxygen demand is a measure of the oxygen-consuming capacity of a wastewater. COD is expressed as the amount of oxygen consumed from a chemical oxidant in mg/L during a specific test. COD results are not necessarily related to BOD, because the chemicals’ oxidant may react with substances in the wastewater that bacteria do not stabilize.
Combustion: A complex sequence of chemical reactions between a fuel and an abundance of oxygen that generates heat. Sometimes it is referred to as rapid oxidation. The reaction occurs between 800°C and 1,000°C (1,450°F to 1,850°F).
Denitrification: The biological reduction of nitrate and nitrites to nitrogen gas.
Flocculation: The gathering together of fine particles after coagulation to form larger particles through a process of gentle mixing.
Gasification: The conversion of carbonaceous material into a combustible gas mixture by partial oxidation (controlled amount of oxidant) of the material at high temperatures. The temperature range for gasification of biomass is 800°C to 1,800°C (1,400°F to 3,200°F).
Incineration: A thermal-treatment process in which organic matter is destroyed by burning at high temperatures of 760°C to 1,100°C (1,400°F to 2,000°F) in a furnace producing ash, flue gases, particulate matter, and heat. The combustible fractions of the manure are burned off and the mineral matter is left as an ash.
Nitrification: The aerobic process in which bacteria change ammonia into an oxidized form of nitrogen (nitrites and nitrate).
Oxidation: The addition of oxygen, removal of hydrogen, or removal of electrons from an element or compound. In treatment of wastewater, organic matter is usually oxidized to more stable substances.
Pyrolysis: The chemical decomposition of organic materials by heat in the absence of oxygen. The process creates three byproducts: char, bio-oil, and gas, depending on the temperature and heating rate.
Stabilization: Conversion to a form that resists change. In manure, the stabilization process results in material that cannot be further or easily decomposed, so the rate and state of manure decomposition would not change to cause any nuisance or odors.
Cornell University. Manure Management Program Fact Sheets. www.manuremanagement.cornell.edu/HTML/Documents/Doc_Fact_Sheets.html
North Carolina State University. Revised 2007. Development of Environmentally Superior Technologies Reports. www.cals.ncsu.edu/waste_mgt/smithfield_projects/smithfieldsite.htm
Dr. P.W. Westerman for providing some questions used in this publication. The author would like to express appreciation for the review and comments made by Matthew Robert, visiting research engineer, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois; Amber D. Vallotton, Extension agent, agriculture and natural resources, Virginia Cooperative Extension Rockingham County Office; C. Corey Childs, Extension agent, agriculture and natural resources/animal science, Virginia Cooperative Extension Loudoun County Office; and Mark Rice, Extension specialist, waste management, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University.
Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, re-print, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Rick D. Rudd, Interim Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Wondi Mersie, Interim Administrator, 1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg.
May 11, 2009