
442-755
Both intensive grazing and water quality protection programs are increasing the need for pumping water to livestock from locations where commercial electricity is not readily available. If electricity is available, it will generally be the most cost-effective method for pumping water. However, there may be instances where the distance from existing power lines to the desired pump location makes it cost-prohibitive to obtain electricity from the utility. A rule of thumb is that alternative energy sources may be economically justified if the distance to commercial power exceeds one-third of a mile. In this case, the livestock producer can select from a range of alternative power methods. The "best" alternative power option is generally site specific.
Prior to considering alternative power options, it is advisable to determine the cost of commercial electricity. This will allow comparison of the cost of commercial electricity to the cost of alternative systems such as solar or wind. If there is already electrical service within 1500 feet of the desired pumping location, it may be feasible to run a private electrical line to the site from the existing service. If the distance is greater, it is advisable to get a price quote from the local electrical utility regarding the cost.
Return to Table of Contents
It is not necessary to provide the entire daily requirement for dairy cows at pasture. Given the opportunity, milking cows will drink some water at the barn before and/or after milking. Provide at least 15 gal per hundred pounds of milk produced for each half day on pasture, especially if pastured during daylight hours.
Return to Table of Contents
The rate of water intake and herd drinking pattern is dependent on the location of the water. If water is located outside the fenced pasture or paddock, such that the animals must leave the pasture area through an opening in the fenced area, the entire herd will tend to go for a drink at the same time. Dominant animals will drink first, leaving the timid animals to drink last. If sufficient flow rate or water capacity isn't present, the last to drink will suffer thirst. This herd drinking behavior has been observed even if the water source is only a few feet outside the pasture.
If the water is some distance from the pasture, or if it is located in the shade, the herd will tend to congregate around the water source and not return to the pasture and grazing. Never locate water more than 500 feet from the nearest corner of the pasture paddock.
On the other hand, if animals do not have to leave the confines of the pasture to drink, they tend to drink one or two at a time as each animal becomes thirsty. In this case, a lower flow rate and fewer drinking spaces are required.
To assure access to water and, therefore, peak animal performance, adequate space should be available at the watering trough to allow for at least 5 % (one animal out of every 20) to drink simultaneously. If the water is outside the pasture area, provide as much drinking space as possible to reduce fighting and waiting time at the tank; at least one space for every 10 animals is recommended. For each animal drinking space, allow 20 inches of perimeter length around a circular tank and 30 inches of length for a tank with straight sides.
To assure that water is always available, a flow rate of 2 gallons per minute (gpm) per animal space is recommended for small tanks with little reserve capacity. For example, for a herd of 50 cattle with water located within the pasture area, it is recommended that a minimum of three drinking spaces (50 x 0.05, rounded up = 3) with a flow rate of 6 gpm (3 spaces x 2 gpm per space = 6) be provided. If there is not sufficient flow rate available to provide 2 gpm per animal served, then additional water storage should be provided. Reserve capacity should allow for at least 2 gallons of water for each cow or horse in the pasturing group and, ideally, the flow rate should allow for the reserve to be replenished within an hour. This information is summarized in Table 2.
Table 1. Livestock water consumption for various animals.
| Livestock | Avg. Consumption (gal/day) | Hot Weather (gal/day) |
|---|---|---|
| Milking cow | 20-25 | 25-40 |
| Dry cow | 10-15 | 20-25 |
| Calves | 4-5 | 9-10 |
| Beef | 8-12 | 20-25 |
| Sheep | 2-3 | 3-4 |
| Horse | 8-12 | 20-25 |
Table 2. System flow rates and reservoir capacities.
Return to Table of Contents
The total head consists of the suction lift (vertical distance from water surface to pump), elevation head (vertical distance from the pump to the highest elevation of water in the system), friction loss (the pumping pressure lost in the system due to friction, which depends upon pipe length, size, material, number and type of pipe fittings, and water flow rate) and the outlet pressure required (the optimum working pressure for proper operation of the water outlet device.) (Figure 1.).
Figure 1. Suction lift and elevation head.
Elevation changes can be measured using a surveying transit or a carpenter's level and a stick of known height. To do this, firmly attach the level to the stick. Next, starting with the stick and level at the water source, sight down the level toward the location for the pump (if you are determining suction lift) or the watering tank (if you are determining elevation head), until your line of sight hits the ground. Move the stick to the point sighted, and repeat the process. Remember to keep the device level as you site down it. The total vertical elevation change will be the number of times you moved the stick multiplied by the height of the stick (Figure 2.).
Figure 2. A method for measuring elevation changes.
To aid in calculating the total pressure losses in the system due to friction, manufacturers provide friction loss tables for all pipe materials and pipe sizes. Table 3 is an example of a friction loss table for plastic (polyethylene) pipe. Friction losses for fittings can generally be ignored in designing livestock watering systems. The data provided in Table 3 are adequate for planning purposes if you plan to use flexible, polyethylene pipe. However, if possible, it is best to use data provided by the manufacturer of the product you plan to purchase.
Typically, friction losses are given per 100 feet of pipe. The longer the distance that water must travel, the greater the total friction loss. Also, as can be seen in Table 1, for a given flow rate, the smaller the pipe, the greater the friction losses. Finally, for a given pipe size, friction losses increase with flow rate.
In order to select a pump for your specific application, you need to specify the desired flow rate and the total head that the pump must overcome.
Total Head is calculated from the following equation:
TH = SL + EH + FL (1)
Where:
TH = total head, ft
SL = suction lift, ft
EH = elevation head, ft
FL = friction losses, ft
Table 3. Friction loss in polyethylene pipe per 100' of pipe
| Nominal1 -------------------- Pipe Size -------------------- | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/2" | 3/4" | 1" | 1-1/4" | 1-1/2" | 2" | |
| Discharge GPM | Pressure Drop, PSI | |||||
| 1 | 0.56 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.04 | - | - |
| 2 | 1.84 | 0.49 | 0.16 | 0.09 | - | - |
| 3 | 3.72 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.04 | - |
| 4 | 6.15 | 1.61 | 0.51 | 0.21 | 0.07 | - |
| 5 | 9.15 | 2.39 | 0.76 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.03 |
| 6 | 12.55 | 3.29 | 1.04 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.04 |
| 7 | 16.53 | 4.32 | 1.37 | 0.47 | 0.18 | 0.05 |
| 8 | 20.91 | 5.46 | 1.74 | 0.58 | 0.23 | 0.07 |
| 9 | 25.70 | 6.77 | 2.13 | 0.70 | 0.28 | 0.08 |
| 10 | 31.18 | 8.10 | 2.57 | 1.43 | 0.33 | 0.10 |
| 15 | 64.03 | 16.64 | 5.27 | 2.38 | 0.68 | 0.21 |
Return to Table of Contents
C = (DR/GPM) x HP x 4.5 x 0.08* (2)
Where:
C = annual energy cost, dollars
DR = daily water requirement, gal
GPM = flow rate, gpm
HP = pump size, hp
4.5 = unit conversions
Return to Table of Contents
The most important consideration in designing a piping system is proper pipe sizing. In general, the right pipe size is a trade-off between a diameter that is small enough to minimize pipe cost and large enough to not result in excessive friction losses, which will increase the pumping energy and therefore pumping costs. In other words, selecting a larger pipe size will result in greater pipe cost, but may allow for a smaller, and perhaps less expensive pump and will reduce the annual energy consumption.
To select a pipe size, the following information is needed:
The steps involved in determining the best pipe size are the following:
D = /0.082*Q (3)
Where:
D = diameter, in
Q = flow rate, gal/min
NOTE: Round D up to the next manufactured pipe size
Example:
Assume a 100-cow herd on pasture. The water source is a pond and the water must be pumped a vertical distance of 30 feet and requires 1,000 feet of pipe. Electricity is available to pump the water. For summer conditions, 2000 gal/day of water will be provided. To allow 5% of the herd to drink at any one time, 5 watering spaces will be provided and a flow rate of 10 gal/min will accommodate the drinking rate of the animals.
Step 1: Determine the minimize size pipe:
D = /10*0.082 = 0.90
Rounding up to the next available pipe size, a 1 inch pipe is the smallest size recommended.
Step 2: One thousand feet of pipe is required. Friction losses were determined from Table 3. One vendor was contacted to determine cost. (The prices were quoted February, 2001, and are provided for example only):
| Pipe Size | Cost for 1,000 feet of pipe, $ | Friction loss for 1,000 feet at 10 gpm, ft. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 in | 220 | 58.7 |
| 1.25 in | 450 | 32.9 |
| 1.5 in | 660 | 07.6 |
Step 3: Determine total system head for each pipe size:
From equation (1) TH = SH + EH + FL. For all three pipes SH + EH = 30 (vertical elevation from water source to watering point). For the 1-inch pipe, FL = 59 and TH=30+59=89. For the 1-1/4-inch pipe, TH =63 and for the 1-1/2-inch pipe, TH =38.
| Pipe Size | TH (ft) | TH (psi) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 inch | 89 | 38.5 |
| 1.25 inch | 63 | 27.3 |
| 1.5 inch | 38 | 16.5 |
Step 4: Call the vendor and determine possible pump sizes, with corresponding flow rates and costs. The vendor will need to know the desired flow rate (10 gpm for this example) and the system pressure. The actual flow rate achieved from a pump depends on the system pressure. The vendor will help you select a pump that meets or exceeds the desired flow rate. Determine the flow rate that the pump is rated for at the system pressure you specify.
| Pipe Size | Pump Size | Flow Rate | Pump Cost ($)* |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 inch | 1/2 hp | 15 gpm | 280 |
| 1.25 | 1/4 hp | 14 gpm | 280 |
| 1.5 | 1/4 hp | 18 gpm | 280 |
Step 5: Determine annual operating cost. For this example, it is assumed that electricity cost is $0.08/KWh.
For 1-inch pipe: C = (DR/GPM) x HP x 4.5 x 0.08* = 2000/15 x 1/2 x 4.5 x 0.08 = $24.00
For 1-1/4 inch pipe: C= $16.97
For the 1-1/2 inch pipe: C =$13.2
Step 6: Compare the options:
| Pipe Size | Pipe + Pump Cost ($) | Annual Operating Cost ($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 500.00 | 24.00 |
| 1-1/4 | 730.00 | 16.97 |
| 1-1/2 | 940.00 | 13.20 |
From the data above, it appears that for this application, the 1-inch pipe is the most economical choice. Even though the 1-inch pipe requires a larger pump that costs about $7.00 more per year to operate, the initial cost for pipe is $230 less. It would take over 70 years to recover the difference in initial cost from the annual energy savings.
Return to Table of Contents
Return to Table of Contents
Most gravity systems are simply tanks equipped with float valves that are located lower than the water source, which is usually a pond. The water pipe should be sized so that excessive friction losses are avoided and adequate flow is achieved. To do this, first determine the pressure available (the vertical elevation change in feet from water level to tank outlet, divided by 2.31). Next, for the pipe size chosen, use a pressure loss table from the pipe manufacturer to determine the pressure loss due to friction at the desired flow rate. Add to the losses the required pressure for the float valve. If the available pressure exceeds the losses plus pressure needed at the float valve, then the desired flow will be achieved. If the available pressure significantly exceeds the pressure required, then repeat the process for a smaller pipe and see if the required pressure is still exceeded. If the pressure remaining at the float valve is not adequate, increase the pipe size and try the calculation again.
If possible, with a pond source, the water delivery pipe should be installed during construction of the pond. It is difficult to install a pipe through a pond berm or levee after pond construction due to potential leak problems.
Gravity systems are limited to locations where the water is above the delivery point. This may be the case with ponds or springs, but is uncommon with streams, which tend to be the lowest point in the pasture. Steep streams may have enough elevation change to allow for gravity systems.
Return to Table of Contents
Electrical alternating current submersible and standard (centrifical) pumps are available for pressurized water systems. Submersible pumps are commonly used in wells, but may also be installed in ponds or streams with proper pump selection. A submersible pump does not require priming and is freeze-proof because the pump is submerged below the water surface. A centrifical pump must be placed close enough to the water surface to ensure that the elevation difference between the water surface and pump does not exceed the suction lift capacity of the pump (approximately 15 to 20 feet). This type of pump must be protected from freezing in cold weather.
Flow rates from ram pumps are typically low. However, the pump operates 24 hours per day, so with adequate storage volume, they can provide a significant amount of water. Ram pumps can be a cost-effective solution for appropriate sites. Generally, a ram pump is not a good choice for a pond, because a large percentage of the water input to the ram is lost. However, if the pond has sufficient out-flow, diverting the out-flow through a ram pump may be an effective option for pumping water to an up slope location.
Flow rates of 1-2 gpm, with lift capacity of about 50 feet, are common from sling pumps. Like ram pumps, they operate continuously, and with storage may be sufficient to meet the needs of some livestock producers.
Drawbacks of sling pumps are their limited application due to site requirements and also their high maintenance requirements. The pump is suspended in the stream, and debris such as leaves and sticks can prevent operation. The pump must be checked and cleaned routinely for dependable operation. Also, the pump must be well secured to prevent loss during high-water events.
Return to Table of Contents
A solar water pumping system consists of the following:
Some solar systems include battery storage. Batteries increase the initial system cost and increase required system maintenance. They can increase the pumping capacity of the system by charging batteries and pumping water during high solar times, pumping from panels only during low solar times, and pumping from batteries when there is not sufficient solar to power the pump. In addition to the items listed above, solar water pumping systems with batteries include:
Cost for a solar pumping system is highly dependent upon the required flow rate and the system head, as this will determine the number of solar panels required. A system designed to provide water for 50 cows, pumping against a total head of 35 feet, will cost between $2,500 and $3,000, plus labor to install. A system to provide water for a 100-cow herd, pumping against a total head of 150 feet, will cost approximately $10,000 plus labor to install.
Format:
| Beaufort Number | Miles/Hour | Wind Speed in Description |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | <1 | Calm: Still: Smoke will rise vertically. |
| 1 | 1-3 | Light Air: Rising smoke drifts, weather vane is inactive. |
| 2 | 4-7 | Light Breeze: Leaves rustle, can feel wind on your face, weather vane is inactive. |
| 3 | 8-12 | Gentle Breeze: Leaves and twigs move around. Light-weight flags extend. |
| 4 | 13-18 | Moderate Breeze: Moves thin branches, raises dust and paper. |
| 5 | 19-24 | Fresh Breeze: Small trees sway. |
| 6 | 25-31 | Strong Breeze: Large tree branches move, open wires (such as telegraph wires) begin to "whistle," umbrellas are difficult to keep under control. |
| 7-12 | >32 | Range from moderate gale to hurricane. |
Return to Table of Contents
Windmills that power piston pumps can lift water 400 to 600 feet from a deep well to a tank. While they can be less costly to install than other systems, they require considerable maintenance.
Wind systems that generate electricity have a minimum wind speed at which they begin to generate power (typically about 7 miles per hour wind) and many systems have a maximum wind speed that they can withstand without turning the blades out of the wind to prevent damage (and thus greatly reduce the power generated). While electric generation from wind is feasible and wind generators can be less expensive than photovoltaic panels for the same generation capacity, they are very site dependent. Hybrid systems, which use both wind and solar generation, are also possible.
Instrumentation to record the actual wind history of a site is available for about $300. The Beaufort Scale (see below), which was devised by rear-admiral Sir Francis Beaufort in 1805, can be used for a rough, visual evaluation of a site. Note that wind speed tends to increase with distance off the ground, so it is important to evaluate a site at the height where the wind generator would be mounted. Mounting a light flag at the proposed location will assist with evaluation. Use the following chart and record your observations over time. A site that frequently rates a 4 or above is a reasonable candidate for wind generation.
Return to Table of Contents
Description of water source: For a stream: depth and flow rate available. For a well: depth to water and water column depth. For a spring: flow rate. It is important to determine flow rates during low flow periods.
For a ram pump, you need vertical distance from water source to pump location (water source must be above pump location), and vertical distance from pump location to desired watering location.
A sketch showing location of water source and desired location of waterers, with distances marked, is helpful.
Return to Table of Contents
Ponds--Planning, Design, Construction
United States Department of Agriculture
Agriculture Handbook Number 590
The following is a partial list of suppliers that can provide you with more information. The use of trade names, etc., in this publication does not imply an endorsement or guarantee by Virginia Cooperative Extension. Likewise, failure to mention a specific brand or company does not imply criticism of those products.
For information on ram, sling and nose pumps:
Rife Hydraulic Engine Manufacturing Company
P.O. Box 70
Wilkes-Barre, PA 18703
570-740-1100
www.riferam.com
For information on ram pumps and solar pumping systems:
The Ram Company
247 Llama Lane
Lowesville, Virginia
(In Virginia)
www.theramcompany.com
For information on solar pumping systems:
Solar Water Technologies, Inc.
426-B Elm Avenue
Portsmouth, Virginia 23706
1-800-952-7221
www.solarwater.com
Sunelco
P.O. Box 787
Hamilton, Montana 59840-0787
1-800-338-6844
www.sunelco.com
Sunelco produces a "Planning Guide and Product Catalog" that contains useful information for designing a solar or wind-powered system. Their catalog is marked $5.00, but if you call, they may send it to you at no cost. Even at $5.00, it is a useful resource for anyone considering purchasing a solar or wind-powered water pumping system.
Return to Table of Contents
Reviewed by Bobby Grisso, Extension Specialist, Biological Systems Engineering
Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, re-print, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Rick D. Rudd, Interim Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Wondi Mersie, Interim Administrator, 1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg.
May 1, 2009