Skip Menu

Return to Skip Menu

Main Navigation

Return to Skip Menu

Main Content

2009 Across-Breed EPD Table

Authors as Published

Drs. Larry Kuehn and Mark Thallman

USMARC Geneticists, Clay Center, NE

The table of adjustment factors to be used to estimate across-breed expected progeny differences (AB-EPDs) for eighteen breeds was presented at the Beef Improvement Federation Annual Meeting in Sacramento, CA on May 2 (see attached Table 1).  Across-breed adjustment factors have been calculated for growth traits and maternal milk since 1993.  Adjustment factors for carcass traits have been calculated since 2008; to be included, breeds must have carcass data in the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) database and report their carcass EPDs on an actual carcass basis using an age-adjusted endpoint.  Bulls of different breeds can be compared on the same EPD scale by adding the appropriate adjustment factor to the EPDs produced in the most recent genetic evaluations for each of the eighteen breeds.  The AB-EPDs are most useful to commercial producers purchasing bulls of more than one breed to use in cross-breeding programs. For example, in terminal cross-breed systems, AB-EPDs can be used to identify bulls in different breeds with high growth potential or favorable carcass characteristics.

As an example, suppose a Gelbvieh bull has a weaning weight EPD of + 42.0 lb and a Simmental bull has a weaning weight EPD of + 24.0 lb.  The across-breed adjustment factors for weaning weight (see Table 1) are 1.7 lb for Gelbvieh and 25.0 lb for Simmental.  The AB­EPD is 42.0 lb + 1.7 lb = 43.7 lb for the Gelbvieh bull and 24.0 lb + 25.0 lb = 49.0 lb for the Simmental bull.  The expected weaning weight difference when both are mated to cows of another breed (e.g., Angus) would be 43.7 lb – 49.0 lb = -5.3 lb.

Most breed associations publish EPDs on an annual basis.  These EPDs predict differences expected in performance of future progeny of two or more bulls within the same breed for traits including birth weight, weaning weight, yearling weight, and maternal milking ability (as reflected in progeny weaning weights).  Normally, the EPDs of bulls from different breeds cannot be compared because most breed associations compute their EPDs in separate analyses and each breed has a different base point.  The across-breed adjustment factors allow producers to compare the EPDs for animals from different breeds for these traits; these factors reflect both the current breed difference (for animals born in 2007) and differences in the breed base point. They should only be used with EPDs current as of July 2009 because of potential changes in EPD calculations from year-to-year. It is important to note that the table factors (Table 1) do not represent a direct comparison among the different breeds because of base differences between the breeds. They should only be used to compare the EPDs (AB-EPDs) of animals in different breeds. To reduce confusion, breed of sire means (i.e., when sires from two different breeds are mated to cows of a third, unrelated breed) between 2007 born animals under conditions at USMARC are presented in Table 2.

It is important to note that the table factors (Table 1) do not represent a direct comparison among the different breeds because of base differences between the breeds. They should only be used to compare the EPDs (AB-EPDs) of animals in different breeds. To reduce confusion, breed of sire means (i.e., when sires from two different breeds are mated to cows of a third, unrelated breed) between 2007 born animals under conditions at USMARC are presented in Table 2.

The adjustment factors in Table 1 were updated using EPDs from the most recent national cattle evaluations conducted by each of the eighteen breed associations (current as of May 2009). The breed differences used to calculate the factors are based on comparisons of progeny of sires from each of these breeds in the Germplasm Evaluation Program at USMARC in Clay Center, Nebraska.  These analyses were conducted by USMARC geneticists Larry Kuehn (email: Larry.Kuehn@ars.usda.gov; ph: 402-762-4352) and Mark Thallman (email: Mark.Thallman@ars.usda.gov; ph 402-762-4261).

TABLE 1: Adjustment Factors to Add to EPDs of Eighteen

Different Breeds to Estimate Across Breed EPDs

Birth

Weaning

Yearling

Maternal

Marbling

Ribeye

Fat

Breed

Wt.

Wt.

Wt.

Milk

Score

Area

Thickness

Angus

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.00

0.00

0.000

Hereford

2.9

-2.8

-16.1

-17.5

-0.36

-0.24

-0.057

Red Angus

2.9

-5.4

-4.4

-3.0

-0.01

-0.21

-0.045

Shorthorn

6.1

19.9

52.8

23.1

0.06

0.12

-0.133

South Devon

4.5

6.9

-1.4

-6.5

-0.32

0.39

-0.131

Beefmaster

7.7

44.2

44.0

2.6

   

Brahman

11.2

36.3

2.2

29.0

   

Brangus

4.7

21.9

19.9

2.4

   

Santa Gertrudis

8.1

17.1

     

Braunvieh

7.5

21.4

12.8

30.6

-0.26

0.78

-0.149

Charolais

9.7

38.2

51.9

5.6

-0.50

0.63

-0.244

Chiangus

4.1

-19.6

     

Gelbvieh

4.5

1.7

-12.6

9.9

   

Limousin

4.2

-3.4

-28.6

-14.2

-0.80

0.93

 

Maine-Anjou

5.5

-10.7

-22.8

-0.8

-0.92

1.07

-0.197

Salers

3.4

22.7

52.3

13.1

-0.11

0.78

-0.224

Simmental

5.5

25.0

22.4

13.7

-0.60

0.92

-0.193

Tarentaise

2.5

29.7

17.9

22.2

   

 

Table 2: Breed of Sire Means for 2007 Born

Animals Under Conditions Similar to USMARC

 

Birth

Weaning

Yearling

Maternal

Marbling

Ribeye

Fat

Breed

Wt.

Wt.

Wt.

Milk

Score

Area

Thickness

Angus

84.7

525.6

907.8

516.7

5.84

12.14

0.549

Hereford

88.9

520.3

879.7

494.6

5.21

11.92

0.483

Red Angus

85.7

507.9

878.3

509.2

5.58

11.83

0.492

Shorthorn

90.8

516.3

904.0

521.8

5.59

12.10

0.405

South Devon

89.6

528.7

901.8

511.0

5.47

12.49

0.417

Beefmaster

90.7

533.7

884.3

500.8

   

Brahman

95.5

532.0

852.1

531.0

   

Brangus

87.8

525.9

887.8

505.8

   

Santa Gertrudis

91.1

503.3

     

Braunvieh

89.8

504.4

842.1

527.0

5.28

12.79

0.386

Charolais

92.8

543.6

920.9

508.2

5.06

12.79

0.295

Chiangus

87.8

506.7

     

Gelbvieh

88.3

524.8

889.2

524.1

   

Limousin

88.4

521.3

878.3

503.3

4.73

13.33

 

Maine-Anjou

89.9

511.5

884.1

515.4

4.83

13.22

0.341

Salers

86.8

522.6

909.6

517.7

5.42

12.79

0.314

Simmental

89.3

539.5

907.7

514.0

5.07

12.99

0.355

Tarentaise

86.5

515.8

856.7

519.3

   

 


Rights


Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, re-print, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.

Publisher

Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Rick D. Rudd, Interim Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Wondi Mersie, Interim Administrator, 1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg.

Date

June 1, 2009


Parent resources:

Other resources in:

Other resources by:

Other resources from: