
Ewe nutrition and management play critical roles in both the performance and profitability of a sheep enterprise. Incorrect assumptions or errors can negatively impact ewe and lamb performance while overcompensation with supplements can reduce the chance of profitability. The following is offered as recommendations to prevent either occurrence.
The fundamental issue of ewe nutrition is well documented and it is important to begin with the basics. The following figures document ewe requirements for dry matter, crude protein, TDN and calcium and phosphorus by month of gestation and lactation. It is essential to be aware of the ewe’s nutrient requirements as you map out a strategy to meet them. Research and experience have demonstrated that underfeeding is false economy and can lead to reduced lambing rate, low birth weight, poor lamb vigor and reduced milk production. On the other hand, being too quick to supplement can result in fat ewes and thin wallets.
Grazed or stored forages are the foundation of any ewe nutrition program.
Table 1 provides supplementation recommendations related to the TDN and crude protein content of hay. Spring lambing flocks can take advantage of new pasture growth which is very digestible and high in protein. Generally, this will meet the nutrient needs of ewes nursing singles. Ewes nursing twins will respond to low levels (1-1.5lb/d) of energy supplementation.
Table 1. Forage Quality and Supplementation (176 lb ewe)1
Forage Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
CP % of DM | TDN % of DM | Early2 Gestation | Late3 Gestation | Early4 Lactation | Late5 Lactation | |||||||
|
| Lbs SBM | Lbs Corn | Lbs SBM | Lbs Corn | Lbs SBM | Lbs Corn | Lbs SBM | Lbs Corn | |||
11.2 & over | 56 & over | - | - | - | .75 | .5 | 2.5 | .3 | 1.5 | |||
9.5 - 11.1 | 56 & over | - | - | .15 | .75 | .8 | 2.5 | .45 | 1.5 | |||
| 53 - 56 | - | - | .15 | .85 | .8 | 2.7 | .45 | 1.65 | |||
| 50 - 53 | - | - | .15 | 1.0 | .8 | 2.9 | .45 | 1.80 | |||
8.2 - 9.5 | 54 - 56 | - | - | .25 | .8 | 1.0 | 2.5 | .55 | 1.5 | |||
| 51 - 54 | - | .2 | .25 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.75 | .55 | 1.75 | |||
| 50 & under | - | .4 | .25 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 3.0 | .55 | 2.0 | |||
7.3 - 8.2 | 53 – 55 | .1 | - | .4 | .8 | 1.1 | 2.5 | .6 | 1.5 | |||
| 51 – 53 | .1 | .2 | .4 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 2.75 | .6 | 1.75 | |||
| 50 & under | .1 | .4 | .4 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 3.0 | .6 | 2.0 | |||
Under 7.3 | Under 48 | .2 - .3 | .5 – 1.0 | .4 - .5 | 1 -1.5 | 1.2 -1.5 | 2.5 -3.5 | .7 - .8 | 2.0 -3.0 | |||
1 Recommendations are made on basis of 44 % soybean meal and ground shelled corn. Other supplements can be used to deliver the same amount of energy and protein.
2 Dry ewes in the first 15 weeks
3 Last 4 weeks of pregnancy (200% lambing rate expected).
4 First 6-8 weeks of lactation suckling twins
5 Last 4-6 weeks suckling twins.
** Note 1.5lbs of corn gluten feed can replace 1.0 lb corn and .5 lb soybean meal.
Stage of Production Suggested Body Condition Score
Maintenance 2
Breeding 3
Early Gestation 2+
Late Gestation 3
Lambing 3+
Weaning 2
Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, re-print, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Alan L. Grant, Dean, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Edwin J. Jones, Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Jewel E. Hairston, Administrator,1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg.
February 2, 2010