Animal welfare considerations for on-farm or backyard slaughter of poultry
ID
APSC-152 (APSC-201NP)
Introduction
On-farm or backyard slaughter of poultry has some advantages and disadvantages from an animal welfare perspective. In this text, some considerations are discussed in relation to the animals' experience prior to slaughter and some suggestions are provided for humane slaughter.
The (dis)advantages of on-farm or backyard slaughter
The advantage of slaughtering animals on farm or in the backyard is that they do not have the stress of transport to market or the slaughter plant. Poultry are usually slaughtered by exsanguination or by decapitation. All approaches to slaughter have the potential for poor welfare as often there is little or no external oversight or formal training. Animals may experience potential stressors during the time before and at slaughter, such as handling and increased human contact, unfamiliar environments, lack of food and water, varying climatic conditions, and changes in social structure, e.g., separation from original social group. If those potential stressors are managed well, most animals may feel minimal fear at slaughter. However, if those are not managed well, they can result in negative experiences such as fear, dehydration and hunger, fatigue and pain.
Restraint
At commercial and on-farm slaughter, birds are suspended upside down, either shackled or in the killing cone. While shackling may improve the efficiency of killing and, in some cases, reduce the time needed for processing, the animal may be subjected to the intense stimuli associated with the period just before slaughter. The suspension by the legs can cause great distress and pain.
Some birds may struggle and vocalize when they are inverted, while others cope by going into a state of tonic immobility, keeping completely still. Although the birds seem calm, tonic immobility is associated with great fear. Poultry would usually show this behavior in response to a predator, by playing dead. This immobility, and the birds’ small size compared to other animals may be some of the reasons why inversion of conscious poultry has been widely accepted, while it is not performed with other animals.
There are other welfare concerns due to being restrained upside down: gravity causes abdominal organs to increase pressure on the heart and respiratory system (because poultry do not have a diaphragm) which increases the work that the heart and respiratory system do. This will feel increasingly more uncomfortable over time. Another stressor for inverted birds is, almost certainly, the psychological experience of being unable to right themselves.
However, there has been little research on the extent to which birds are distressed by inversion. In one example researchers evaluated stress in three groups of broilers who were shackled, respectively, for 30 seconds, 60 seconds or 120 seconds. Based on behavioral measures and measurements of corticosterone and lactate, the authors concluded that shackling those birds for more than 60 seconds caused excessive stress (Bedáňová et al., 2007). But in their study, the animals did not undergo other stressors due to transport, crating, and holding at the plant that commercial poultry typically have before being slaughtered. The interval between inversion and stunning should not exceed 60 seconds.
For a thorough guide on humane restraint and slaughter, visit: https://www.hsa.org.uk/
Slaughter with or without stunning
Slaughter is performed by a throat cut followed by the draining of blood (exsanguination). If animals are conscious when their throat is cut, they may experience pain, fear, anxiety and distress from the method of restraint and from the cut itself. If it takes the animals a long time to lose consciousness, they may feel further distress due to hypotension caused by blood loss. Cutting the throat may cause aspiration of blood into the upper and lower respiratory tracts during breathing.
To avoid unnecessary suffering, poultry and other animals are often made unconscious, i.e., stunned, prior to exsanguination at slaughter. The requirement for stunning prior to slaughter is based on the understanding that (1) animals are sentient beings, thus can experience pleasure and pain, and (2) that neck cutting causes pain and suffering, which can be avoided by pre-slaughter stunning.
From an animal welfare perspective, it is important that a stun results in limited pain and the animal remains unconscious until and after the neck is cut or broken. The bird should be rendered unconscious before it is able to register that it has been stunned. In many species measurements indicate that it takes about 200 milliseconds (1/5th of a second) for the nervous system to register and interpret pain from the stun, so ideally a stun should be effective within 200 milliseconds.
Three stunning methods
The most common methods of stunning are electrical stunning, concussive captive bolt stunning, or gas stunning. Electrical and concussive stunning can achieve immediate loss of consciousness, so within 200 milliseconds. Gas stunning will take more time.
Animals stunned with electricity regain consciousness within 20 to 60 seconds depending on the species; so, they must be killed quickly after the stun. In contrast, captive bolt stunning can result in long-lasting or permanent loss of consciousness, so there is less time pressure to slaughter the animal.
Electrical stunning
Electrical stunning renders animals’ unconscious by delivering electrical energy to the brain and causing a ‘grand mal’ seizure, i.e. uncoordinated electrical activity, like epilepsy. The amount of electrical energy supplied to the brain (the current) depends on the voltage; this is influenced by the electrical resistance of the tissues in the head.
Too low voltage, and it may take longer than 200 milliseconds for the birds to lose consciousness, too high and it may reduce meat quality due to hemorrhaging in the muscle. Recommended levels are 300-400mA for small birds, like chickens, and 400mA for larger birds, like turkeys (World Organization for Animal Health, 2024).
Current flow is reduced by poor contact between the electrodes and the head, which can be made worse by dirt on the electrodes or the bird. Poor current flow can result in an ineffective stun and considerable suffering to the bird. Pre-wetting the bird’s head (using a wet sponge) can improve the electrical contact. More information on a low-cost, single-bird electrical stunning method can be found here: https://www.aces.edu/blog/topics/farming/poultry-euthanasia-electrical-euthanasia-device/
Signs of an effective electrical stun are:
- Neck arched with eyes fully open.
- No rhythmic breathing immediately after the stun.
- Rigidly extended legs.
- Constant rapid body tremors.
- Wings held close to the body (following initial uncontrolled bursts of flapping).
Concussive captive bolt stunning
With captive bolt stunning, a severe blow to the head is applied, resulting in the nervous tissue severely being damaged. The animal is rendered unconscious within 15 milliseconds. The bird may also die, but blood still needs to be drained if the animal is intended for consumption. A captive bolt gun may be penetrating or non-penetrating, and the positioning is important to render a successful stun. The stun may result in uncontrolled body movement and wing flapping, which it is a sign of an effective stun. This will continue in the unconscious bird until the spinal cord stops functioning.
Signs of an effective concussion stun are:
- No rhythmic breathing (check for abdominal movements in the vent area).
- Uncontrolled wing flapping.
- Leg flexion and extension.
- No neck tension.
- No vocalization.
Gas stunning
This method of stunning causes a loss of consciousness or killing due to anoxia. This means the bird inhales a blend of gases that result in lack of oxygen in the blood and central nervous system.
Depending on the duration of exposure, the bird may die. Regardless, the bird should be drained from blood if it is intended for consumption.
This method is not recommended for the on-farm or small-scale slaughter of poultry as welfare and safety hazards are likely to occur without the necessary facilities for precise monitoring of the gas concentration. Also, some gasses like, CO2 can cause irritation and aversion. More information about a method for single-bird carbon dioxide stunning is provided here: https://www.aces.edu/blog/topics/farming/poultry-euthanasia-single-bird-carbon-dioxide-system/
Signs of an effective gas stun are:
- No rhythmic breathing (check for abdominal movements in the vent area).
- No neck tension.
- No vocalization.
- No nictitating membrane reflex.
Slaughter methods
Appropriate slaughter methods include a neck cut, cervical dislocation (breaking the neck), or decapitation, all causing or followed by draining the blood (exsanguination).
A neck cut should be performed with a sharp, non- serrated knife, using a singular, long movement. The neck cut should target one or both carotid arteries.
Inappropriate slaughter methods include neck crushing, manual concussion, drowning or freezing. Neck crushing with pliers is deemed inhumane because animals die from asphyxiation rather than brain damage or cardiac arrest. Manual concussion could be done by using a rod or bat, however, this it is difficult to perform appropriately and may result in extreme pain and distress if done incorrectly.
Drowning or freezing are slow methods and can be extremely stressful.
Cervical dislocation
Cervical dislocation may be preferable to neck cutting when an animal sick, to avoid the risk of disease spread from spillage of blood and bodily fluids. The animal should not be consumed. Cervical dislocation causes rupturing of the spinal cord, which stops breathing, and disrupts the blood flow to the brain by rupturing blood vessels in the neck.
Cervical dislocation is a common method to kill poultry for other reasons than human consumption. However, research findings shows that it unlikely to cause immediate loss of consciousness. Therefore, stunning prior to cervical dislocation is recommended to ensure a humane kill. Cervical dislocation without stun should only be used in an emergency when better methods are not available.
Decapitation
Decapitation involves severing the head from the neck using a sharp blade. It is not recommended on animal welfare grounds, as brain activity may continue for up to 30 seconds and it is doubtful the bird is rendered immediately unconscious.
Decapitation is not an acceptable method of slaughter without prior stunning.
Meat quality
The animal’s physiological responses to stunning and slaughter can affect meat quality. Distress can affect the acidity and water-holding capacity of the muscle. In poultry ‘dark firm dry’ (DFD) meat results from pre-slaughter stress, for instance extreme cold during holding or rough handling.
DFD meat has a higher pH, which means the normal post-mortem setting of meat (rigor mortis) does not occur and the meat looks dark, and is firm and dry. Also, the meat can have a bad taste and is more susceptible to spoiling due to bacteria. DFD meat indicates that the animals experienced distress, injury, disease or fatigue before slaughter.
References
Bedáňová, I., Voslárová, E., Chloupek, P., Pistĕková, V., Suchy, P., Blahova, J., Dobsikova, R. and Vecerek, V. (2007). Stress in broilers resulting from shackling, Poultry Science 86(6), 1065–1069. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.6.1065.
Boyal, R.S., Buhr, R.J, Harris, C., Jacobs, L., and D.V. Bourassa. 2020. Poultry Euthanasia: Electrical Euthanasia Device. The Alabama Cooperative Extension System.
Boyal, R.S., Buhr, R.J, Harris, C., Jacobs, L., and D.V. Bourassa. 2020. Poultry Euthanasia: Single Bird Carbon Dioxide System. The Alabama Cooperative Extension System. September 18, 2020
Martin, Jessica E. 2015. Humane mechanical methods for killing poultry on-farm. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/6634/
The Humane Slaughter Association. https://www.hsa.org.uk/
World Organisation for Animal Health. 2024. Terrestrial Animal Health Code. https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/terrestrial-code-online-access/
Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, reprint, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.
Virginia Cooperative Extension is a partnership of Virginia Tech, Virginia State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments. Its programs and employment are open to all, regardless of age, color, disability, sex (including pregnancy), gender, gender identity, gender expression, genetic information, ethnicity or national origin, political affiliation, race, religion, sexual orientation, or military status, or any other basis protected by law.
Publication Date
August 9, 2024