
452-510
Introduction
Lime Quality
Liming Materials
State Regulations
Liming Material Selection
Lime Application
References
Acid soil limits crop yields on many Virginia farms. With only a few exceptions, the climate in Virginia causes unlimed soils to be moderately to strongly acidic. This soil acidity can be directly toxic to plants but more often; it reduces the plants' efficiency at nutrient utilization, especially phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and nitrogen (N). Proper management of soil acidity is the foundation of efficient soil fertility management in Virginia.
Acid soils are made less acidic by adding a liming material. An agricultural liming material, or "Aglime," is a material containing calcium (Ca) and/or magnesium (Mg) compounds capable of neutralizing soil acidity. These materials include: limestone (both calcitic and dolomitic), burnt lime, slaked lime, marl, and various by-products. Liming materials are carbonates, oxides, or hydroxides of Ca and/or Mg.
The two primary factors that determine limestone quality are particle (mesh) size and chemical composition. Particle size influences the speed at which the material dissolves (rate of reaction). Chemical composition determines a liming material's acid-neutralizing value or the amount of acid a set amount of material can neutralize. Pure calcium carbonate (CaCO3) is the standard for all liming materials and has an acid neutralizing value of 100 percent. When a liming material is evaluated, it is compared to calcium carbonate, and its neutralizing value is called the Calcium Carbonate Equivalent (CCE) value or percent CCE.
Another factor determining the quality of a liming material is its moisture content. The percent moisture content determines how much of the chemical reactive material has been replaced with water. Therefore, higher moisture content reduces the effectiveness of liming materials on a weight basis; i.e. a ton of dry lime will neutralize more acid than a ton of wet lime. However, research has shown that a 4 percent to 5 percent moisture content in a ground agricultural limestone improves spreading uniformity by reducing the blowing of fine (<100-mesh) particles as compared to totally dry (<1 percent) liming material.
The final factor determining liming material quality is its magnesium content. Therefore, the combination of the particle size, CCE, handling characteristics, and magnesium content determine the "value" of a particular liming material for a specific farm situation.
A liming material with a higher CCE value will have a greater effectiveness than one with a lower CCE value. Impurities, such as clay and organic matter that naturally occur in liming materials, produce variations in CCE among various liming materials.
Knowing the CCEs of liming materials can help in comparing costs and determining application rates. The CCE values of various liming materials are shown in Table 1. Liming materials with values above 100 have a greater capacity to neutralize soil acidity than calcitic lime (Tables 1 and 2) due to their chemical composition. Burnt and hydrated limes are in this category. Marl, on the other hand, has a lower CCE than calcitic lime; and therefore, more is needed per acre for the same neutralizing effect.
| Table 1. Liming materials, chemical composition, and calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE). | ||
|---|---|---|
| Material | Composition | Calcium Carbonate Equivalent (%)* |
| Calcium Carbonate | CaCO3 (pure) | 100* |
| Calcitic limestone | CaCO3 | 80-100 |
| Dolomitic limestone | CaCO3-MgCO3 | 95-108 |
| Burned or Quick lime | CaO (calcium oxide) | 150-175 |
| Hydrated or Slaked lime | Ca(OH)2 (calcium hydroxide) | 120-135 |
| Marl | CaCO3 | 70-90 |
| Ground Oyster Shells | CaCO3 | 90-100 |
| Cement kiln dusts | Ca Oxides | 40-100 |
| Power plant ashes | Ca, Mg & K Oxides | 25-50 |
| Wood ashes | Ca, Mg & K Oxides | 40-50 |
| Gypsum | CaSO4 | None |
| Byproducts & Biosolids | variable | variable |
| * Calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE) is the acid-neutralizing value for a liming material relative to pure calcium carbonate that has a CCE value of 100. This is the standard method of measuring Aglime purity. | ||
| Table 2. The amount of Aglime materials at different calcium carbonate equivalences (CCE) required to equal one ton of pure calcium carbonate. | ||
|---|---|---|
| CCE of Liming Material % | Pounds of lime needed to equal one ton of Pure calcium carbonate (CaCO3) | Tons of lime needed to equal one ton of Pure calcium carbonate (CaCO3) |
| 50 | 4000* | 2.00 |
| 60 | 3333 | 1.67 |
| 70 | 2857 | 1.42 |
| 80 | 2500 | 1.25 |
| 90 | 2222 | 1.11 |
| 100 | 2000 | 1.00 |
| 110 | 1818 | 0.91 |
| 120 | 1667 | 0.83 |
| 135 | 1481 | 0.74 |
| 150 | 1333 | 0.67 |
| 175 | 1143 | 0.57 |
| * Calculated based on a lime recommendation of 1 ton of pure calcitic lime. Pounds of lime needed = (CCE of pure CaCO3 ÷ CCE of liming material) á 2000 lbs. | ||
Particle size is measured by standard size sieve mesh (Fig. 1) and is the main factor influencing the rate of reaction of lime applied to soil; the finer its grind, the more surface area the Aglime has available to react with soil acidity. Mesh size is a measure of the number of openings per linear inch of a sieve. The relative sizes of lime particles of different meshes are shown in Figs. 2-5. A 20-mesh sieve has 20 openings per linear inch or 20 x 20 = 400 openings per square inch, whereas a 100-mesh sieve has 100 openings per linear inch or 100 x 100 = 10,000 openings per square inch. Crushed limestone material passing a 100-mesh sieve is smaller, has more surface area, and therefore, reacts with soil acidity more rapidly than 20-mesh material.
A certain percentage of the particles in a liming material must be sufficiently fine (pass a 100-mesh sieve) to react rapidly with soil acidity and supply the nutrient elements calcium and magnesium. Another percentage (those that pass a 60- to 100-mesh sieve) should react within one to two years with the remainder (those that pass a 20-mesh sieve) reacting in a period of two to three years. A high-quality agricultural limestone has a range of particle sizes that allows it to have both immediate (two-week) and long-term (three-year) capacity to react with soil acidity. This need is the basis for the Virginia Agricultural Liming Materials Act (Code of Virginia Section 3.1-126.1), which sets the requirements for Aglime at 30 percent passing a 100-mesh sieve, 50 percent passing a 60-mesh sieve, and 90 percent passing a 20-mesh sieve (Figs. 2-5).
Research has shown that limestone pulverized to 100-mesh, or fi ner, reacts rapidly to neutralize soil acidity. On the other hand, 10- to 20-mesh limestone dissolves very slowly and therefore, is only slightly effective in raising soil pH (reducing soil acidity). The effect of the same application rate of different mesh-sized lime particles on the pH of a Canfi eld silt loam soil over a period of 18 months is illustrated in Fig 6. Smaller particles with a size of 20- to 30-mesh or above were effective in neutralizing soil acidity whereas larger particles of 8- to 20-mesh or below were relatively ineffective. The results presented in Fig. 6 are from a greenhouse study where lime was thoroughly mixed with soil and watered to maintain optimum moisture conditions. The rate of reaction of agricultural lime under these conditions is generally more rapid than one would expect under fi eld conditions. However, under fi eld conditions, particle size is an important factor affecting the rate of lime decomposition. Large particles (4- to 8-mesh) dissolve very little (10 percent) over a one- to four-year period (Table 3), demonstrating the ineffectiveness of course lime materials for reducing soil acidity. The smaller particles (80- to 100-mesh) can be expected to react completely over a period of one to four years. Thus, particles coarser than 20-mesh have little value as Aglime material because of their slow reaction rate.
| Table 3. The effect of fineness of grind on the reactivity of Aglime in soil.* | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sieve Mesh Size | Years after application | |
| 1 | 4 | |
| Percent Reacted | ||
| coarser than 8 | 5 | 15 |
| 8 to 20 | 20 | 45 |
| 20 to 50 | 50 | 100 |
| 50 to 100 | 100 | 100 |
| *AGR-106. 2002. Cooperative Extension Service, University of Kentucky. Meyer and Volk (1952). | ||
The reaction rate of limestone depends on the soil pH and the degree of mixing of lime with the soil, as well as on the particle size. The more acid (lower pH) the soil is, the more rapid is the lime reaction rate. In addition, the better the limestone is mixed with soil, the more rapid the lime reaction rate. Reaction rate also depends on the solubility of the liming material. Burnt and hydrated lime are more soluble in water than ground Aglime, and thus react more rapidly to neutralize soil acidity. The quick-acting characteristics of these lime materials can be an advantage in certain situations, even though the materials are more diffi cult to handle and spread than ground Aglime.
Liming materials of equal CCE and mesh size should cost about the same, assuming equal hauling distance from the manufacturer to the fi eld. Burnt and hydrated limes are more expensive per ton but a smaller amount is needed because of their higher CCEs. Cost comparisons must always be based on equivalent amounts of CCE needed per acre. Lime recommendations based on soil test reports, unless otherwise specifi ed, are typically for Aglime that has a CCE value of 95 to 100. If burnt lime with a CCE of 175 is used, only 1,140 pounds (0.57 ton) are needed to achieve the same effect as one ton of ground limestone with a CCE of 100 (Table 2). The equivalent amount per acre of any liming material can be calculated with the following formula.
Where:
CCE = Calcium carbonate equivalent or the acid-neutralizing value (usually 100 for lime recommendation on soil test report)
A = Lime shown on soil test report
B = Liming material chosen by buyer
The most common material used for liming agricultural soils in Virginia is fi nely ground dolomitic or calcitic limestone. Aglime is a material composed of varying concentrations of calcium and magnesium carbonates and must have a minimum of 85 percent CCE to be labeled and sold as "Aglime" in Virginia (Virginia Agricultural Liming Materials Act 1994 and supporting regulations, Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services). Particle size is specified by state law and regulated through the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Current particle size requirements are shown in Table 4. Particle size for Aglime is regulated since crushed limestone must be ground fine enough to react and neutralize soil acidity in a reasonable length of time. In addition to Aglime, there are several materials that can be used to adjust soil pH. All will neutralize soil acidity, but they have different characteristics and properties that influence their use and value. The more common liming materials are discussed below.
| Table 4. Mesh screen analysis (Minimum Screening Standards) of agricultural limestone marketed in Virginia (The Virginia Agricultural Liming Materials Act, Code of Virginia Section 3.1-126.1) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural Liming Material | Mesh Screen Size | Percent Guaranteed to Pass (5% Tolerance) |
| Ground Limestone | 20 | 90 |
| 60 | 50 | |
| 100 | 30 | |
| Pulverized Limestone | 20 | 95 |
| 100 | 70 | |
These liming materials are made by grinding or crushing mined limestone rock. The product is distributed in bulk or in bags. Calcitic limestone is a term widely used by agronomists when referring to Aglime with a high calcium content. It is composed primarily of calcium carbonate, but it may also contain small amounts of magnesium carbonate. In Virginia, calcitic limestone is any material that has 85 percent or more of the total acid-neutralizing value, expressed as CCE, derived from calcium carbonates. Dolomitic limestone is composed of calcium and magnesium carbonates. In Virginia, dolomitic limestone is any Aglime that has 15 percent or more of the total carbonate content as magnesium carbonate. The CCE of dolomitic Aglime is often higher than that of calcitic Aglime because of the difference in chemical (Mg versus Ca) composition.
Calcitic lime reacts slightly faster than dolomitic lime of the same particle size but the difference in reactivity rates is negligible under field conditions. The factor to consider in deciding which Aglime to use is the need for magnesium and the relative cost of the liming materials. Dolomitic lime contains an appreciable amount of both magnesium and calcium that are essential nutrient elements in plant growth; whereas, calcitic lime contains mostly calcium. They have essentially the same capacity for neutralizing soil acidity as indicated by their CCE values (Table 1).
Research has shown that plant growth is optimum when more calcium than magnesium is available to the plant. However, the ratio of plant-available calcium to magnesium can be nearly equal before plant growth is adversely affected. Acid soils that are deficient in magnesium (low to very low in the soil test) should be treated with dolomitic limestone. Either dolomitic or calcitic lime may be used in all other situations.
There are a number of by-products used as soil amendments and many of these contain alkaline compounds that can neutralize soil acidity and add calcium and magnesium to a soil. When amendments containing alkaline compounds are applied to soils, they should be analyzed for CCE values to determine their contribution to soil lime requirements, and soil pH should be monitored to prevent excessive soil pH levels. Excessive soil pH values can result in micronutrient deficiencies, especially Mn and Zn in the Coastal Plain region, and Zn in the Piedmont and Valley regions.
Under the Virginia Agricultural Liming Materials Law, all liming materials distributed in Virginia must be approved and registered for sale annually. Each package or lot sold must show the registered brand name and guaranteed analysis. Items in the analysis include: whether burned or unburned; the minimum percentage of calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, calcium oxide, and magnesium oxide; and the percentage of ground limestone passing certain mesh sizes. These mesh sizes are used to define pulverized limestone and agricultural ground limestone, the two types of Aglime sold in Virginia. These two types of Aglime are distinguished based on the particle sizes summarized in Table 4. In addition, agricultural liming materials are also required to meet minimum calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE) requirements as listed in Table 5.
| Table 5. Minimum calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE) for agricultural liming materials marketed in Virginia. (The Virginia Agricultural Liming Materials Act, Code of Virginia Section 3.1-126.1) | |
|---|---|
| Liming Material | Calcium Carbonate Equivalent (CCE) |
| Ground Limestone | Not less than 85% |
| Burnt (Burned) Lime | Not less than 140% |
| Hydrated Lime | Not less than 110% |
| Shells | Not less than 85% |
The effective neutralizing value (ENV) is used to express Aglime effectiveness based on the combined effect of chemical composition, purity (CCE), and particle size or fineness of grind. ENV values are required labeling for liming materials distributed in Virginia. The ENV for a specific liming material is determined by multiplying the CCE by factors based on the fineness of grind of the limestone, using the following formula:
Where:
CCE = calcium carbonate equivalent (%)
A = (% by weight passing a 20-mesh sieve - % by weight passing a 60-mesh sieve) x 0.4
B = (% by weight passing a 60 mesh sieve - % by weight passing a 100-mesh sieve) x 0.8
C = (% by weight passing a 100-mesh sieve) x 1.0.
If applied to supply equivalent amounts of ENV per acre, all liming materials should have an equal effect on crop yield.
Often great care is taken to determine the proper amount of lime needed for a fi eld based on soil testing, but a poor job is done in selecting and applying lime. For many years, ground agricultural limestone or Aglime has been the primary liming material used in Virginia. However, as illustrated in Table 1 there are a number of products that can be used to increase soil pH. Factors to consider in selecting a liming material include available lime sources in the area, the length of time between application of lime and planting of the crop, degree of soil acidity, the need for magnesium, value of the crop, and the intensity of cropping.
Whether to use a slow- or a quick-acting liming material can be a diffi cult and confusing decision. The time between the application of lime and planting the crop can be helpful in answering this question. If lime can be applied three to six months ahead of planting, then more coarsely ground limestone can be used. Aglime works best when applied in this manner. However, the fi ne particles (percent passing 100-mesh) in Aglime will react very quickly and yield benefi ts will be seen even if lime is applied at the time of planting. Research conducted in Virginia by P.M. Bertsch and M.M. Alley on Coastal Plain soils, showed that extractable soil calcium and magnesium increased more rapidly with suspension limestone applications as compared to conventional Aglime. However, after 16 weeks, pH and exchangeable calcium and magnesium levels were nearly the same for the two liming materials. Moreover, corn yields responded equally to suspension and conventional ground Aglime. These data clearly illustrate that Aglime meeting Virginia specifi cations immediately reacts with soil acidity and does produce a crop response even when lime is applied at the time of planting (Fig. 8).
The degree of soil acidity can be important in deciding which liming material to use, especially for acidsensitive crops such as alfalfa, sweet clover, trellis tomatoes, and certain other vegetables. In strongly acid soils, it may be desirable to use pulverized lime or one of the burnt or hydrated limes. These liming materials will benefi t crops and reduce the level of soil acidity more quickly. Though the cost per acre may be somewhat greater, improved crop performance may result in higher net income. The value of the crop should be considered in determining what lime source to use, especially for those crops that are acid-sensitive or have a critical pH requirement. Aglime has its maximum effect in a period of one to three years. Suspension, burnt, and slaked lime have their maximum effect in three to six months if the lime is properly mixed with the soil.
Cropping intensity is a factor in a liming program as it usually infl uences liming frequency. Where more crops and/or greater yields are being produced, more calcium and magnesium are removed from the soil. Also, the application of ammonium and urea types of nitrogen fertilizers increases the need for lime. The natural nitrifi cation process of these fertilizers produces acid and tends to speed the acidifi cation of soils. A soil test every two or three years will reveal the need for lime. Fig. 9 shows the effect of different rates of lime on several soils over a period of 38 months. In these studies, the maximum increase in soil pH occurred within approximately two years after the lime application. Sandy soils generally require less lime at any one time than silt or clay soils to increase pH by a given amount. Sandy soils, however, usually need to be limed more frequently.
A liming material should spread easily to achieve a uniform application over the entire fi eld. Aglime meeting Virginia specifi cations generally spreads easily and evenly. However, liming materials exposed to rainfall in outdoor stockpiles and containing a relatively high moisture content can "cake" and not flow uniformly through the applicator, resulting in non-uniform application patterns. Research conducted in Virginia by M.M. Alley demonstrated that Aglime meeting Virginia's requirements should handle easily and spread evenly when using commercial twin-spinner spreading equipment.
Lime moves slowly in soil; consequently, lime works most efficiently when mixed to tillage depth. Also, as soil pH increases, lime particles dissolve more slowly. Uniform application and thorough incorporation of Aglime are helpful to a good liming program. The one exception to this "tillage rule" is a continuous "no-tillage" system for grain crops and alfalfa.
Research with no-tillage corn and forages has shown that surface-applied lime has been effective in reducing soil acidity in the surface two to four inches of soil, especially in fields that have been limed to the tillage depth in previous years. The mulch layer in no-till fields maintains more optimum moisture conditions in the surface soil. This helps lime dissolve faster and speeds the neutralization of soil acidity in the surface layers. Fig. 10 shows alfalfa yields on a Davidson soil in Virginia as affected by incorporated and non-incorporated limestone applications. In this study, high alfalfa yields were sustained from non-incorporated as compared to incorporated Aglime after six growing seasons. When switching from conventional tillage to no-till, a good management strategy would be to incorporate the recommended rate of Aglime to tillage depth during the final primary tillage operation prior to making the conversion to no-till.
When possible, lime should be mixed to tillage depth. On moderately acid soils (pH 5.2 to 5.7), a single application of lime made either before or after tillage will usually give good results. For strongly acid soils (pH 5.0 and below) that have very high lime requirements, it may be desirable to apply one-half of the lime before tillage and the remaining half after tillage. A disc-harrow can be used for mixing lime with the soil. This method is more practical for high-value crops or for crops particularly sensitive to acid soil conditions in relatively small areas. For large areas that have high lime requirements, i.e. three to four tons per acre, it is probably best to apply one-half of the required lime in a first-year application, and then apply the other half of the lime the second year. Most benefits during the first year of crop growth will be obtained from the first application, and the cost of liming can be spread over two years.
The uniform application of lime is just as important as selecting the right type and amount of lime for a given situation. Careless application can result in a loss of income and may create problems with some areas in the field being under-limed and other areas being over-limed. Though soils are limed to correct the acid condition that has developed over time, soils can be over-limed. This often happens when applications overlap too much in the spreading operation or if there is uneven distribution for other reasons. Factors that affect the pattern of distribution by bulk lime spreaders (Fig. 11) include the rate of application per acre, driving speed, steadiness of the speed, and equal distribution of lime by the spreader.
Usually, it is best to apply no more than two tons of Aglime per acre at one time with bulk spreaders. Higher rates tend to overload the spinners and result in non-uniform application. This results in over application directly behind the truck. To prevent double applications, equipment should be well calibrated to determine the proper spreading swath and operated to reduce overlap during a spreading operation. Proper training for operators and using devices such as foam markers or GPS-controlled parallel swathing equipment (i.e. Lightbars) are crucial to maximizing the economic return from lime treatments.
Calibration is critical for proper rate of application and must be done on a regular basis. Growers should insist on current calibration of the spreaders used to apply lime for them, and should have a set of calibration pans and scales for calibrating their own spreaders.
Bertsch, P.M., and M.M. Alley. 1981. Conventional and suspension limestone influence on soil chemical properties and corn and soybean yields. Agronomy Journal 73:1075-1078.
Havlin, J.L., J.D. Beaton, S.L. Tisdale, and W.L. Nelson. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers, An Introduction to Nutrient Management, 6th edition. Prentice Hall, N.J.
Alley, M.M. 1981. Short-term soil chemical and crop yield responses to limestone applications. Agronomy Journal 73:687-689.
Alley, M.M., G.D. McCart, D.D. Wolf, and E.S. Smith. 1980. Particle size effects on stockpiling and spreading agricultural limestone. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44:438-440.
Padgett, P.E. and M.M. Alley. 1988. Evaluation of pelletized, "Granular," Pulverized, and ground agricultural limestone products for neutralizing soil acidity. Applied Agricultural Research 3(2):110-115.
Meyer, T.A., and G.W. Volk. 1952. Effect of particle size of limestone on soil reaction, exchangeable cations, and plant growth. Soil Science Society of America Journal 73:37-52.
Nagle, S.M. 1983. Evaluation of selected lime requirement tests for Virginia soils developed through field response of soil pH and crop yields. M.S. Thesis, Virginia Tech.
Rasnake, M., L. Murdock, G. Schwab and B. Thom. 2002. Determining the Quality of Aglime: Using Relative Neutralizing Values. AGR-106, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky. (www.ca.uky.edu/agc/pubs/agr/agr106/agr106.htm).
Wolf, D.D., D.E. Starner, and L.G. DiPaola. 1994. No-Till Alfalfa Production: Limestone Amendment for Acid Soil. Journal of Production Agriculture 7:490-494.
Originally published as:
McCart, G.D., G.W. Hawkins, and G.R. Epperson. 1970. Lime for Acid Soils, what to use and how to apply, Extension Division, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Publication 405.
Reviewed by Mark Alley, Professor, Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences
Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, re-print, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Alan L. Grant, Dean, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Edwin J. Jones, Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Jewel E. Hairston, Interim Administrator,1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg.
May 1, 2009