Virginia Tech® home

Faba Bean: A Multipurpose Specialty Crop for the Mid-Atlantic USA

ID

SPES-590NP

Authors as Published

Rahul Raman, Postdoctoral Associate, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech; Maria Balota, Professor, School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech; Abhilash Chandel, Assistant Professor, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech; and Pius Jjagwe, Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech

Introduction

Faba bean (Vicia faba L.), also known as fava bean, broad bean, horse bean, or Windsor bean, is a leguminous crop used as food, feed, forage, or cover crop in different parts of the world (Smither- Kopperl, 2019; figure 1).

Figure 1. A faba bean plant with green leaves and pods. The image of the faba bean plant is from the Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Suffolk, Virginia, on December 4, 2023. The image source for pods is an article written by Lela Nargi dated January 12, 2017, on Civil Eats website.
Figure 1. Faba bean (A) plant on December 4, 2023, at the Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Suffolk, VA, and (B) pods. Source for the image of pods: https://civileats.com/2017/01/12/modern-benefits-from-ancient-seeds-the-hunt-for-wild-fava-beans/

The global production of faba beans in 2022 was around 1,810,000 tons for green and 6,770,000 tons for dry bean, with total area harvested around 640,000 and 6,630,000 acres, respectively (FAOSTAT, 2024). Worldwide, faba bean production and harvested area is highest in Asia and Africa (figure 2). China and Ethiopia, the highest producers, contributed to around 28% and 18% of the global dry faba beans production in 2022, respectively. China and Ethiopia were the highest producers of dry faba beans in 2020 and 2021, too.

 Figure 2. Pie charts showing regional contribution (%) to dry and green faba bean area harvested and production in 2022. The pie charts were generated from crops and livestock statistical data available on the website of Food and Agriculture Organization.
Figure 2. Regional contribution (%) to dry faba bean (A) area harvested and (B) production, and green faba bean (C) area harvested and (D) production in 2022 (FAOSTAT, 2024).

Similarly, Algeria and Egypt were the highest producers of green faba beans from 2020 to 2022, accounting for 17% and 9% of the global production in 2022, respectively. Although there are more than 50 faba bean-producing countries, the Middle East, China, Ethiopia, Egypt, Afghanistan, India, Northern Europe, and Northern Africa are the major producers (Dhull et al., 2022). The USA produced a little less than 50,000 tons of green faba beans, accounting for approximately 3% of the global production in 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively (FAOSTAT, 2024). Close to 40,000 acres of land were harvested in the USA for green faba beans in 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively.

Why Faba Bean?

Based on the data compiled by Banaszkiewicz (2011), Griffiths and Lawes (1978), Hall et al. (2017), and Martineau-Côté et al. (2022) from several studies, the nutritional composition of faba bean is comparable to the other legumes (table 1). The crude protein content of faba bean (22-38%) is lower than that of soybean (32-43.6%) and lupin (32-44%), but significantly higher than for the other beans, including pea, lentil, chickpea, and other dry beans. Comparable to other leguminous crops such as lentils, beans, chickpeas, and peas, faba bean is rich in vitamins (Chávez-Murillo et al., 2018; Martineau-Côté et al., 2022; Raikos et al., 2014). The fat content of faba seed is lower than pea by 13% and soybean by 93%.

Unlike soybean, faba bean is a non-genetically modified crop and not a regulated allergen (Calabrò et al., 2014; Health Canada, 2023). In addition to vitamins, proteins, and fat, faba bean contains a significant amount of dietary fiber in the range of 12.3-13.5% (Singh et al., 2017).

Table 1. Nutritional composition of faba bean as compared to other legumes. Crude protein has been expressed in % on dry weight basis. For carbohydrates, the total carbohydrate (TCH) and starch have been expressed in g/100 g dry weight and amylose as the % of total starch. The total, insoluble, and soluble dietary fibers, i.e., TDF, IDF, and SDF, have been expressed in g/100 g dry weight. Data has been compiled from Banaszkiewicz (2011), Griffiths and Lawes (1978), Hall et al. (2017), and Martineau- Côté et al. (2022).

Legumes

Crude protein (%) TCH(g/100 g)  

Starch (g/100 g)

Amylose (%)

TDF (g/100 g) IDF (g/100 g) SDF (g/100 g)

Faba bean

22.0-38.0

55.2-71.4

28.1-47.5

18.6-44.4

6.4-34.9

10.7-30.3

0.6-7.6

Soybean

32.0-43.6

19.7-33.2

0.2-6.7

-

13.7-35.5

15.4-32.6

0.6-6.1

Kidney bean

17.0-27.0

63.0-74.0

31.0-43.0

34.0-42.0

18.0-30.0

15.0-29.0

1.0-6.0

Navy bean

19.0-27.0

67.0-75.0

21.0-40.0

28.0-41.0

14.0-25.0

15.0-18.0

3.0-5.0

Great northern bean

 

23.0-27.0

 

69.0-71.0

 

18.0-37.0

 

31.0-42.0

 

20.0-21.0

 

15.0-16.0

 

5.0-6.0

Pinto bean

18.0-25.0

70.0-76.0

27.0-40.0

26.0-37.0

14.0-26.0

11.0-22.0

3.0-4.0

Lentil

23.0-31.0

42.0-72.0

37.0-59.0

19.0-25.0

7.0-23.0

11.0-19.0

1.0-7.0

Cowpea

24.0-28.0

42.0-63.0

35.0-52.0

14.0-20.0

11.0-34.0

11.0-30.0

1.0-4.0

Chickpea

19.0-27.0

52.0-71.0

30.0-56.0

23.0-28.0

6.0-15.0

10.0-18.0

1.0-8.0

Pea

14.0-31.0

55.0-72.0

30.0-49.0

23.0-49.0

3.0-20.0

10.0-20.0

2.0-9.0

Lupin

32.0-44.0

47.0

1.0-9.0

0

14.0-55.0

31.0-34.0

4.0-5.0

Although highly nutritious and like other legumes, faba bean has some anti-nutritional components in the seed such as phytic acid, vicine, convicine, saponins, lectins, raffinose, stachyose, tannins, and digestive enzyme inhibitors (Labba et al., 2021; Mattila et al., 2018; Sharma and Sehgal, 1992). To address this deficiency, many plant breeding and crop improvement programs are focused on improving the nutritional qualities of faba beans, thereby reducing the anti-nutritional content. Recently, new improved faba bean cultivars with low tannins, as well as low vicine and convicine contents have been developed (Hou et al., 2018; Khazaei et al., 2019). In addition to sustainable agricultural practices, faba bean cultivars can be used as food and animal feed.

Faba Bean as a Food Crop

Globally, faba beans are used for diverse purposes. As a highly nutritious crop, it has found its place in various Mediterranean and Asian dishes such as Falafel (bean burger/deep fried dough), Medammis (stewed beans), Nabet soup (germinated boiled beans), and Bissara (poured paste) (Bakr, 1996; Dhull et al., 2022; Hamza et al., 1987). Green or dried beans, fresh or canned, can be used as vegetables and, in some countries, the roasted seeds are consumed as a snack (Gasim and Link, 2007; Singh et al., 2013). Faba bean flour can also be consumed in the form of gluten-free bread and spaghetti pasta. The gluten- free breads from unfermented and fermented faba bean flour were found to be more porous than soy flour bread by 34% and 18%, respectively (Sozer et al., 2019). Moreover, the addition of faba bean flour to corn in a 70:30 ratio can enhance the protein content of spaghetti by about 15% (Giménez et al., 2013).

Every 10% addition of faba bean flour to the wheat flour enhanced the protein content of spaghetti by about 2.25% (Giménez et al., 2012). To meet the increasing demand for protein-rich foods and sustainable production, an increase in the supply of faba is required. Plant-based food systems being more sustainable than animal-based can act as an alternative to the latter. The protein content of faba bean (25- 40%) being higher than most of the pulse legumes, makes it an excellent source for plant-based food (Augustin and Cole, 2022; Chávez-Murillo et al., 2018; Hall et al., 2017). Similarly, due to the high protein content and increased demand for legume-based milk, faba bean can be used as an alternative to meat and milk (Augustin and Cole, 2022; Multari et al., 2015). For human consumption, the anti- nutritional content in faba bean can be reduced by several processing methods, such as soaking, cooking, autoclaving, germination, and extrusion (Dhull et al., 2022; table 2).

Table 2. Processing methods to reduce anti-nutritional contents in faba bean. The increase (+), decrease (-), and no change (0) in the anti-nutritional contents have been expressed as %. Data has been compiled from Alonso et al. (2000), Anderson et al. (1994), Dhull et al. (2022), Khalil and Mansour (1995), and Khalil (2001).

Anti-nutritional factors

Soaking

Germination

Cooking

Autoclaving

Extrusion

Vicine

-

-27.9

-35.3

-39.7

-

Convicine

-

-29.6

-33.3

-40.7

-

Phytic acid

-27.0

-75.0

-40.0

-49.0

-26.7

Raffinose

-

0.0

0.0

0.0

-

Stachyose

-

-100.0

-47.0

-21.0

-

Tannins

+40.8

-29.0

-55.2

-60.0

-54.4

Trypsin inhibitor

-4.5

-31.9

-71.5

-84.4

-98.9

Chymotrypsin inhibitor

-8.4

-12.1

-

-

-52.8

α-amylase inhibitor

-14.9

-37.2

-

-

-100.0

Faba Bean as Animal Feed

In addition to human consumption, faba beans can be used for animal feed. For this purpose, faba bean seeds have similar or higher nutritional value than the other legumes (Meng et al., 2021; Mordenti et al., 2007). Although nutritious, the presence of anti-nutritional factors, in particular vicine and convicine, may affect the biological value of protein by decreasing its digestibility (Gnanasambandam et al., 2012). However, several breeding programs are focused on developing cultivars with low vicine and convicine content to make faba bean an alternative for other legumes for animal feed. Gous (2011) found that the broiler chickens fed with pelleted faba beans up to 250 g/kg showed no negative effect on birds’ performance. The heat generated during the pelleting process destroyed the anti-nutritional components of the faba seed. Faba beans can be used as feed for cattles, bulls, and pigs, too. Addition of 30% of ground faba bean in the feed does not alter the feed consumption, milk production (>30 kg per cow per day), or milk composition (crude protein or lipid) of dairy cows (Brunschwig et al., 2002). Although the effect of faba bean on dairy cattle depends on the cultivar, even the cultivars with high anti-nutritional contents can also be used up to 20% in the feed without affecting the cow’s daily milk yield, protein, and lactose production (Melicharová et al., 2009). Similarly, young bulls fed with faba bean concentrate-enriched feed instead of soy concentrate feed alone produced meat lower in fat, cholesterol, and total saturated fatty acid content (Calabrò et al., 2014). Faba bean is beneficial for cattle, bulls, and broiler chickens, but the studies suggested contradictory findings for pigs. Faba bean used up to 20% within the feed protein mixture did not affect pigs’ performance; however, when used as the major source of protein or as complete soy replacement, results showed a linear reduction of pigs’ growth rate (Brand et al., 1995; Castell, 1976). Overall, faba bean meal is a great source of protein and energy for ruminants, second after soybean meal (table 3).

Table 3. Protein and energy values for faba bean compared to other ruminant feed. The values are INRA quoted, compiled from O’Kiely et al. (2022) and Sauvant et al. (2004).
Composition

Faba bean

Barley grain

Soybean meal

Pea seed

Crude protein (g/kg DM)

302

116

539

240

Digestible protein IA (g/kg DM)

52

35

212

34

Digestible protein IN (g/kg DM)

192

80

395

150

Digestible protein IE (g/kg DM)

112

100

272

96

Forage unit for milk production (per kg DM)

1.2

1.1

1.21

1.2

Forage unit for meat production (per kg DM)

1.2

1.07

1.21

1.22

Organic matter digestibility (%)

91

83

93

92

Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg DM)

13.4

12.3

13.6

13.4

DM: Dry matter; Digestible protein IA: Digestible protein in the intestine of dietary origin; Digestible protein IN: Digestible protein in the intestine where nitrogen is the limiting factor for rumen microbial activity; Digestible protein IE: Digestible protein in the intestine where energy is the limiting factor for rumen microbial activity.

 

Faba Bean for Sustainable Agricultural Practices

Faba bean, being a leguminous crop, can fix atmospheric nitrogen in the soil, thus improving soil fertility. Compared to the other cool-season legumes such as pea and lupin, faba bean can attain and fix more nitrogen from the atmosphere to soil (Hardarson et al., 1991; Hauggaard-Nielsen et al., 2009; Jensen et al., 2010; Peoples et al., 2009). Therefore, it can be planted as a cover crop or in rotation with other non- leguminous crops, thus minimizing additional nitrogen requirement by the latter and contributing to agricultural sustainability. Faba bean planted in rotation in a no-till system can also reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the cultivated land (Sarauskis et al., 2020). It can be planted as a main or cover crop, for dual purpose cropping systems (Brasier et al., 2023; Etemadi et al., 2019). Regardless of the cropping system, after pod harvest, remaining biomass can be incorporated into the soil or left on the soil surface, depending on the type of tillage, thus improving soil nitrogen and organic matter availability, a credit for the following crops. In addition, legumes such as faba bean and pea can reduce nitrogen leaching from the soil by scavenging the residual nitrogen with shoot uptake values of 92-276 and 104 kg N ha-1, respectively (Hauggaard-Nielsen et al., 2009). Faba bean also increased soil phosphorus availability by forming mycorrhizal associations in soils. Being a host to some aphid species, such as black bean aphid, it can be used in integrated pest management (Köpke and Nemecek, 2010) by attracting predatory insects feeding on aphids (Stoddard et al., 2010). Intercropping faba bean as a component of integrated pest management can protect the main crop and reduce the use of insecticides, thus contributing to environmental sustainability.

Why Mid-Atlantic USA?

Faba bean is a cool-season crop that can grow well in the Mid-Atlantic during winter. Although temperatures ranging from 60-65 °F are the best for its growth, faba bean can grow at temperatures ranging from 45-75 °F, with varieties that can withstand frosts and freezes (Etemadi et al., 2015). As temperatures are expected to increase by 2.7 °F by 2050 and 3.6-7.2 °F by 2100 (Collins et al., 2013), and frequently exceed the optimum temperature for growth and development of summer crops, winter-hardy cultivars of faba can ensure cropping system diversification while minimizing the negative effects of summer heat on crop yield (Ramsey et al., 2022). This will ensure more sustainable crop production in the Mid-Atlantic. If grown for green or dry seed in addition to cover crop, winter faba bean can also improve the economic profitability of this region. In terms of soil requirements, faba bean can grow in a wide range of soils, but well-drained and slightly acidic soils with pH around 6.0 are the best suited for faba production (Etemadi et al., 2015). The agricultural land of the Mid-Atlantic has soils that check both requirements for drainage, most soils are loams and sandy-loams, and acidity, most soils are slightly acidic with pH ranging from 5.5-6.5 (Abaye et al., 2006), making this region a favorable home for faba bean cultivation.

Faba Bean Research at the Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center in Virginia

A USDA-funded project at the Virginia Tech’ s Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center (TAREC) in Suffolk, VA, is focused on introduction of faba bean as a winter seed crop with multiple benefits for the Mid-Atlantic cropping systems. The project includes collaborators from the University of Maryland, University of Delaware, North Carolina State University, and University of Georgia, in addition to the Virginia State University and Virginia Tech. Started in 2023 and lasting until 2027, the project will address objectives related to cultivar development through breeding, genetics and physiological strategies, identification of the best agronomic practices to maximize yield and economic return, economic and marketing logistics, and consumer acceptance. Currently, 500 varieties of faba bean from 50 countries are being tested for cold tolerance in Georgetown, DE, and Petersburg and Suffolk, VA (table 4).

Table 4. Number of faba bean varieties from different parts of the world planted at the Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Suffolk, VA, Virginia State University, Petersburg, VA, and Carvel Research and Education Center, Georgetown, DE. The number of varieties planted in these three locations varies from 492-504. At Suffolk, VA, 504 varieties are being tested.

Country

Number of entries

Country

Number of entries

Country

Number of entries

Afghanistan

12

Georgia

3

North Macedonia

7

Argentina

1

Germany

4

Pakistan

20

Armenia

1

Greece

2

Peru

15

Australia

1

Hungary

21

Poland

2

Belgium

1

India

2

South Africa

1

Bolivia

3

Iran

28

Soviet Union

6

Bulgaria

3

Iraq

9

Spain

19

Canada

10

Israel

6

Sudan

2

Chile

2

Italy

6

Sweden

1

China

100

Japan

1

Syria

4

Colombia

1

Jordan

1

Taiwan

1

Cyprus

1

Kenya

11

Tajikistan

24

Ecuador

3

Kyrgyzstan

1

Turkey

25

Egypt

6

Mexico

1

United Kingdom

18

Ethiopia

8

Morocco

12

USA

75

Finland

2

Nepal

5

Yemen

2

France

8

New Zealand

1

N/A

5

Throughout the winter, stand count, frost damage and plant survival were periodically recorded. As of mid-March 2024, survival rate was over 75%, with more than 50% of varieties starting to bloom as soon as early December 2023 (figure 3).

Figure 3. Faba bean research plots at the Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Suffolk, Virginia, on December 4, 2023, and January 29, 2024, at growth degree days (GDD) of 1303 and 2028 degree Farenheit.
Figure 3. Faba bean research plots at the Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Suffolk, VA, on (A) December 4, 2023, and (B) January 29, 2024, when faba varieties received 1303 °F and 2028 °F, respectively, heat units or growth degree days (GDD).

Insect and disease ratings were taken by collaborating researchers, Drs. Alejandro Del-Pozo (Hampton Roads AREC) and Doug Higgins (Eastern Shore AREC) and their graduate students. A drone was flown repeatedly over the plots at all locations and, from collected and processed images, information on plant growth and development will be derived (figure 4). Finally, the most yielding and healthier varieties will be selected for further in-depth agronomic research in response to the common pests and production practices of the region. As the results became available, the PI will provide updates. An Advisory Committee will help the researchers to stay engaged with growers and stakeholders on faba production, management, and use for its successful introduction as a multipurpose crop in the Mid-Atlantic USA.

 Figure 4. False color band composite of faba bean research trial derived from the images collected by the drone on February 29, 2024, at Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center in Suffolk, Virginia.
Figure 4. Faba bean research plots at Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Suffolk, VA, on February 29, 2024, shown in a false color composite (near-infrared-red-red edge). Plots of faba bean representing individual varieties are colored in pink. Varieties with the most biomass accumulation and vigor are shown in the most intense pink color, whereas the green plots represent dead varieties.

Acknowledgements

The research project at the Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center is funded by the USDA Specialty Crops Research Initiative, grant number 13881197.

References

Abaye, A. O., T. J. Basden, D. B. Beegle, G. D. Binford, W. L. Daniels, S. W. Duiker, K. C. Haering, G. K. Evanylo, D. J. Hansen, and G. L. Mullins. 2006. The Mid-Atlantic nutrient management handbook. https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/content/dam/pubs_ext_vt_edu/CSES/CSES-122/CSES-122-pdf.pdf.

Alonso, R., A. Aguirre, and F. Marzo. 2000. Effects of extrusion and traditional processing methods on antinutrients and in vitro digestibility of protein and starch in faba and kidney beans. Food Chemistry 68 (2): 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00169-7.

Anderson, J. C., A. O. Idowu, U. Singh, and B. Singh. 1994. Physicochemical characteristics of flours of faba bean as influenced by processing methods. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 45 (4): 371-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01088087.

Augustin, M. A., and M. B. Cole. 2022. Towards a sustainable food system by design using faba bean protein as an example. Trends in Food Science & Technology 125: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.04.029.

Bakr, A. A. 1996. Effect of Egyptian cooking methods of faba beans on its nutritive value, dietary protein utilization and iron deficiency anemia 1. The role of main technological pretreatments. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 49 (1): 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092525.

Banaszkiewicz, Teresa. 2011. "Nutritional Value of Soybean Meal." In Soybean and Nutrition, edited by El-Shemy Hany, Ch. 1. Rijeka: IntechOpen.

Brand, T. S., R. C. Olckers, and J. P. Van der Merwe. 1995. Evaluation of faba beans (Vicia faba cv. Fiord) and sweet lupins (Zupizus albus cv. Kiev) as protein sources for growing pigs. South African Journal of Animal Science 25 (2): 31-35. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC-1eff758fec.

Brasier, K., I. Zaragoza, J. Knecht, R. Munster, H. Coulter, A. Potter, E. Enke, A. Fox, E. Mosqueda, and H. Zakeri. 2023. Potential of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) for Dual-purpose Vegetable Production and Cover Cropping. HortScience 58 (1): 23-31. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI16843-22.

Brunschwig, P., J. M. Lamy, Inra, and Inra. 2002. "Faba bean or sunflower meal as vegetable sources of protein in dairy cow diets." 9th Meeting on Ruminant Research.

Calabrò, S., M. I. Cutrignelli, O. J. Gonzalez, B. Chiofalo, M. Grossi, R. Tudisco, C. Panetta, and F. Infascelli. 2014. Meat quality of buffalo young bulls fed faba bean as protein source. Meat Science 96 (1): 591-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.08.014.

Castell, A. G. 1976. Comparison of faba beans (vicia-faba) with soybean-meal or field peas (pisum- sativum) as protein supplements in barley diets for growing-finishing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 56 (3): 425-432. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas76-053.

Collins, M., R. Knutti, J. Arblaster, J. L. Dufresne, T. Fichefet, P. Friedlingstein, X. J. Gao, W. J. Gutowski, T. Johns, G. Krinner, M. Shongwe, C. Tebaldi, A. J. Weaver, M. Wehner, M. R. Allen, T. Andrews, U. Beyerle, C. M. Bitz, S. Bony, B. B. Booth, H. E. Brooks, V. Brovkin, O. Browne, C. Brutel-Vuilmet, M. Cane, R. Chadwick, E. Cook, K. H. Cook, M. Eby, J. Fasullo, E. M. Fischer, C. E. Forest, P. Forster, P. Good, H. Goosse, J. M. Gregory, G. C. Hegerl, P. J. Hezel, K. I. Hodges, M. M. Holland, M. Huber, P. Huybrechts, M. Joshi, V. Kharin, Y. Kushnir, D. M. Lawrence, R. W. Lee, S. Liddicoat, C. Lucas, W. Lucht, J. Marotzke, F. Massonnet, H. D. Matthews, M. Meinshausen, C. Morice, A. Otto, C. M. Patricola, G. Philippon-Berthier, Prabhat, S. Rahmstorf, W. J. Riley, J. Rogelj, O. Saenko, R. Seager, J. Sedlácek, L. C. Shaffrey, D. Shindell, J. Sillmann, A. Slater, B. Stevens, P. A. Stott, R. Webb, G. Zappa, and K. Zickfeld. 2013. "Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility." In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, edited by S. Joussaume, A. Mokssit, K. Taylor and S. Tett, 1029-1136. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Dhull, S. B., M. K. Kidwai, R. Noor, P. Chawla, and P. K. Rose. 2022. A review of nutritional profile and processing of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Legume Science 4 (3): e129. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.129.

Chávez-Murillo, C. E., J. I. Veyna-Torres, L. M. Cavazos-Tamez, J. de la Rosa-Millán, and S. O. Serna- Saldívar. 2018. Physicochemical characteristics, ATR-FTIR molecular interactions and in vitro starch and protein digestion of thermally-treated whole pulse flours. Food Research International 105: 371- 383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.029.

Etemadi, F., M. Hashemi, A. V. Barker, O. R. Zanduakili, and X. B. Liu. 2019. Agronomy, Nutritional Value, and Medicinal Application of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.). Horticultural Plant Journal 5 (4): 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2019.04.004.

Etemadi, F., M. Hashemi, F. Mangan, and S. Weis. 2015. Fava beans growers guide in New England. University of Massachusetts. https://ag.umass.edu/sites/ag.umass.edu/files/research-reports/fava_bean_guide_2.pdf.

FAOSTAT. 2024. Crops and livestock products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Last Modified February 14, 2024. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.

Gasim, S., and W. Link. 2007. Agronomic Performance and the Effect of Self-Fertilization on German Winter Faba Beans. Journal of Central European Agriculture 8 (1): 121-127.

Giménez, M. A., S. R. Drago, D. De Greef, R. J. Gonzalez, M. O. Lobo, and N. C. Samman. 2012. Rheological, functional and nutritional properties of wheat/broad bean (Vicia faba L.) flour blends for pasta formulation. Food Chemistry 134 (1): 200-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.02.093.

Giménez, M. A., R. J. González, J. Wagner, R. Torres, M. O. Lobo, and N. C. Samman. 2013. Effect of extrusion conditions on physicochemical and sensorial properties of corn-broad beans (Vicia faba) spaghetti type pasta. Food Chemistry 136 (2): 538-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.08.068.

Gnanasambandam, A., J. Paull, A. Torres, S. Kaur, T. Leonforte, H. Li, X. Zong, T. Yang, and M. Materne. 2012. Impact of Molecular Technologies on Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Breeding Strategies. Agronomy 2 (3): 132-166. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy2030132.

Gous, R. M. 2011. Evaluation of faba bean (Vicia faba cv. Fiord) as a protein source for broilers. South African Journal of Animal Science 41 (2): 71-78.

Griffiths, D. W., and D. A. Lawes. 1978. Variation in the crude protein content of field beans (Vicia faba L.) in relation to the possible improvement of the protein content of the crop. Euphytica 27 (2): 487- 495. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043174.

Hall, C., C. Hillen, and J. G. Robinson. 2017. Composition, Nutritional Value, and Health Benefits of Pulses. Cereal Chemistry 94 (1): 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-03-16-0069-FI.

Hamza, M. A., A. M. El-Tabey Shehata, and H. Stegemann. 1987. Effect of traditional methods of processing on the electrophoretic patterns of faba bean water soluble proteins. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 36 (4): 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01892347.

Hardarson, G., S. K. A. Danso, F. Zapata, and K. Reichardt. 1991. Measurements of nitrogen fixation in fababean at different N fertilizer rates using the 15N isotope dilution and ‘A-value’ methods. Plant and Soil 131 (2): 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00009445.

Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., S. Mundus, and E. S. Jensen. 2009. Nitrogen dynamics following grain legumes and subsequent catch crops and the effects on succeeding cereal crops. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 84 (3): 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9242-7.

Health Canada. 2023. Common food allergens. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food- nutrition/food-safety/food-allergies-intolerances/food-allergies.html.

Hou, W., X. Zhang, Q. Yan, P. Li, W. Sha, Y. Tian, and Y. Liu. 2018. Linkage Map of a Gene Controlling Zero Tannins (zt-1) in Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) with SSR and ISSR Markers. Agronomy 8 (6). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8060080.

Jensen, E. S., M. B. Peoples, and H. Hauggaard-Nielsen. 2010. Faba bean in cropping systems. Field Crops Research 115 (3): 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.008.

Khalil, A. H., and E. H. Mansour. 1995. The effect of cooking, autoclaving and germination on the nutritional quality of faba beans. Food Chemistry 54 (2): 177-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(95)00024-D.

Khalil, M. M. 2001. Effect of soaking, germination, autoclaving and cooking on chemical and biological value of guar compared with faba bean. Food / Nahrung 45 (4): 246-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3803(20010801)45:4<246::AID-FOOD246>3.0.CO;2-F.

Khazaei, H., R. W. Purves, J. Hughes, W. Link, D. M. O'Sullivan, A. H. Schulman, E. Björnsdotter, F. Geu-Flores, M. Nadzieja, S. U. Andersen, J. Stougaard, A. Vandenberg, and F. L. Stoddard. 2019. Eliminating vicine and convicine, the main anti-nutritional factors restricting faba bean usage. Trends in Food Science & Technology 91: 549-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.051.

Köpke, U., and T. Nemecek. 2010. Ecological services of faba bean. Field Crops Research 115 (3): 217- 233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.012.

Labba, I. C. M., H. Frøkiær, and A. S. Sandberg. 2021. Nutritional and antinutritional composition of fava bean (Vicia faba L., var. minor) cultivars. Food Research International 140: 110038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110038.

Martineau-Côté, D., A. Achouri, S. Karboune, and L. L'Hocine. 2022. Faba Bean: An Untapped Source of Quality Plant Proteins and Bioactives. Nutrients 14 (8). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14081541.

Mattila, P. H., J. M. Pihlava, J. Hellström, M. Nurmi, M. Eurola, S. Mäkinen, T. Jalava, and A. Pihlanto. 2018. Contents of phytochemicals and antinutritional factors in commercial protein-rich plant products. Food Quality and Safety 2 (4): 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyy021.

Melicharová, V., A. Pechová, R. Dvorák, and L. Pavlata. 2009. Performance and Metabolism of Dairy Cows Fed Bean Seeds (Vicia faba) with Different Levels of Anti-Nutritional Substances. Acta Veterinaria Brno 78 (1): 57-66. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200978010057.

Meng, Z., Q. Q. Liu, Y. Zhang, J. H. Chen, Z. P. Sun, C. H. Ren, Z. J. Zhang, X. Cheng, and Y. F. Huang. 2021. Nutritive value of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) as a feedstuff resource in livestock nutrition: A review. Food Science & Nutrition 9 (9): 5244-5262. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2342.

Mordenti, A. L., F. Merendi, M. Fustini, and A. Formigoni. 2007. Effects of different protein plants in cows diet on milk for Parmigiano Reggiano production. Italian Journal of Animal Science 6: 463-465. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.463.

Multari, S., D. Stewart, and W. R. Russell. 2015. Potential of Fava Bean as Future Protein Supply to Partially Replace Meat Intake in the Human Diet. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 14 (5): 511-522. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12146.

O’Kiely, P., M. McGee, and S. Kavanagh. 2022. Faba beans as a feed for cattle and sheep.

Peoples, M. B., J. Brockwell, D. F. Herridge, I. J. Rochester, B. J. R. Alves, S. Urquiaga, R. M. Boddey, F. D. Dakora, S. Bhattarai, S. L. Maskey, C. Sampet, B. Rerkasem, D. F. Khan, H. Hauggaard- Nielsen, and E. S. Jensen. 2009. The contributions of nitrogen-fixing crop legumes to the productivity of agricultural systems. Symbiosis 48 (1-3): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179980.

Raikos, V., M. Neacsu, W. Russell, and G. Duthie. 2014. Comparative study of the functional properties of lupin, green pea, fava bean, hemp, and buckwheat flours as affected by pH. Food Science & Nutrition 2 (6): 802-810. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.143.

Ramsey, A. F., J. B. Tack, and M. Balota. 2022. Double or Nothing: Impacts of Warming on Crop Quantity, Quality, and Revenue. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47 (1): 1-+. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.307462.

Sarauskis, E., K. Romaneckas, A. Jasinskas, R. Kimbirauskiene, and V. Naujokiene. 2020. Improving energy efficiency and environmental mitigation through tillage management in faba bean production. Energy 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118453.

Sauvant, D., J. M. Perez, and G. Tran. 2004. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials. 304. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-668-7.

Sharma, A., and S. Sehgal. 1992. Effect of processing and cooking on the antinutritional factors of faba bean (Vicia faba). Food Chemistry 43 (5): 383-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(92)90311-O.

Singh, A. K., R. C. Bharati, N. C. Manibhushan, and A. Pedpati. 2013. An assessment of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) current status and future prospect. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8 (50): 6634- 6641.

Singh, B., J. P. Singh, N. Singh, and A. Kaur. 2017. Saponins in pulses and their health promoting activities: A review. Food Chemistry 233: 540-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.161.

Smither-Kopperl, M. 2019. Plant Guide for fava bean (Vicia faba). Lockeford, CA 95237: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lockeford Plant Materials Center.

Sozer, N., L. Melama, S. Silbir, C. G. Rizzello, L. Flander, and K. Poutanen. 2019. Lactic Acid Fermentation as a Pre-Treatment Process for Faba Bean Flour and Its Effect on Textural, Structural and Nutritional Properties of Protein-Enriched Gluten-Free Faba Bean Breads. Foods 8 (10). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8100431.

Stoddard, F. L., A. H. Nicholas, D. Rubiales, J. Thomas, and A. M. Villegas-Fernández. 2010. Integrated pest management in faba bean. Field Crops Research 115 (3): 308-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.07.002.


Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, reprint, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.

Virginia Cooperative Extension is a partnership of Virginia Tech, Virginia State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments. Its programs and employment are open to all, regardless of age, color, disability, sex (including pregnancy), gender, gender identity, gender expression, national origin, political affiliation, race, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, military status, or any other basis protected by law

Publication Date

March 26, 2024