Resources for College of Natural Resources and Environment
|Virginia 4-H School Enrichment: Forestry||May 1, 2009||388-802|
|Virginia Wildlife Project - Wildlife Foods||May 1, 2009||390-405|
|Moving Toward Sustainable Forestry: Strategies for Forest Landowners||
The forests of the United States have undergone substantial changes since European settlement in the 1600’s. In colonial America, trees were viewed as weeds, and land was cleared to plant agricultural crops. Timber was used to make cabins, fences, and other structures important to frontier life. Forests continued to be cleared as the United States became an important member of the world’s economy. Our forests were one of our most important resources and provided us with wood for housing, paper, and export goods. Forests were cut and the land cleared with little further thought. Deforestation then began to slow, but we still viewed the forest as an unlimited supply of timber, wildlife, homesites, and recreation opportunities. The increasing interest in the environment has now caused us to stand back and think about the sustainability of our forest practices.
|Dec 15, 2014||420-144 (AREC-108NP)|
|Trees for Problem Landscape Sites -- Air Pollution||Apr 8, 2015||430-022 (HORT-123P)|
|Trees for Problem Landscape Sites — Trees for Landscape Containers and Planters||
Planting trees in aboveground containers and planters is becoming a common practice on sites that are not suited for inground planting. Containers differ from raised planters in that they are usually smaller in volume and moveable, whereas planters are generally larger, and often built as part of the permanent hardscape (paving, etc.). The greatest challenge in selecting trees for containers and planters is in choosing trees that can survive temperature extremes, and that can establish roots in a limited volume of substrate (potting soil). Consider several factors when selecting containers and trees including environmental influences, container and planter design, substrate type, and tree characteristics.
|Apr 9, 2015||430-023 (HORT-119P)|
|Trees for Problem Landscape Sites — Trees for Hot Sites||
Hot landscape sites require special consideration before trees are planted. Trees can survive, and even thrive, in hot sites if the site is prepared correctly, if heat-tolerant species are selected, and if the trees are properly maintained. A variety of different locations and situations qualify as hot landscape sites.
|Apr 9, 2015||430-024 (HORT-118P)|
|Trees for Problem Landscape Sites — Screening||
Using trees as living screens can easily enhance living and working spaces. Before selecting trees for screening, first determine the screen’s purpose, whether functional or environmental. Screening can be used to define an area, modify or hide a view, create privacy, block wind, dust, salt and snow, control noise, filter light, and direct traffic flow.
|Apr 9, 2015||430-025 (HORT-117P)|
|Trees for Problem Landscape Sites — Wet and Dry Sites||
To grow, all trees require air, light, water and nutrients. Some trees can survive over a wide range of climatic and soil conditions, whereas others are very site specific. Both wet and dry sites present establishment and growth challenges, making selection of the right tree for the right site very important.
|Apr 8, 2015||430-026 (HORT-114P)|
|Virginia Master Naturalist, American Naturalists||
Jared Diamond (2005), in his book, “Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed,” defines landscape amnesia as one of the primary mechanisms for the decline and ultimate collapse of societies. This phenomenon occurs when people lose knowledge of how the natural world once was, with each succeeding generation accepting a degraded environment as the status quo. Carried to its end, a society remains unconcerned until it reaches the point of no return.
|Jun 19, 2015||465-312(ANR-20NP)|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service December 2015 Housing Commentary: A||Feb 24, 2016||ANR-182NP|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service December 2015 Housing Commentary: Part B||
“If current laws governing federal taxes and spending generally remained in place, by CBO’s projections, real GDP would grow by 2.7 percent this calendar year and by 2.5 percent in 2017, as measured by the change from the fourth quarter of the previous year. From 2018 through 2020, the economy would grow at an average annual rate of 2.0 percent, CBO projects.
|Feb 25, 2016||ANR-183NP|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service February 2016 Housing Commentary: Section I||
In February, housing was mixed. Total and single-family starts improved modestly month-over-month. Once again, aggregate housing permits were disappointing – total permits decreased month-over-month; single-family permits eked out a gain, and multifamily permits were decidedly negative. Housing under construction data indicated minimal increases and housing completions were negative. Total private and new single-family construction spending increased somewhat. New house sales exhibited some growth and existing sales were disappointingly negative.
|Apr 29, 2016||ANR-189NP (ANR-196NP)|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service February 2016 Housing Commentary: Section II||
The baseline scenario for the United States is a moderate economic expansion through the projection period. Real GDP grows at an average rate of 2! percent per year. The unemployment rate declines to 4! percent in the middle of 2017 and remains near that level through the end of the scenario period. CPI inflation rises to 2! percent at an annual rate by the middle of 2017 before dropping back to about 2 percent in the first quarter of 2018 and remaining near that level thereafter.
|May 4, 2016||ANR-190NP (ANR-197NP)|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service October 2015 Housing Commentary: Section I||Mar 24, 2016||ANR-191NP|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service March 2016 Housing Commentary: Section I||May 17, 2016||ANR-202NP|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service March 2016 Housing Commentary: Section II||May 17, 2016||ANR-203NP|
|Wood Identification for Species Native to Virginia||
Virginia has many tree species that yield a rich variety of wood, each with its own unique structural, physical, and mechanical properties. These differences determine a species’ suitability for products. Because wood is a readily available and popular material, it is important that enthusiasts and professionals be able to distinguish between different species. For example, how would a barrel manufacturer tell the difference between red oak, which doesn’t hold liquids, and white oak, which does?
|Sep 24, 2013||ANR-64P|
|Agency 229 Matters||Dec 13, 2017||CALS-1099NP|
|The Impact of Agency 229||Dec 13, 2017||CALS-1122NP|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service September 2017 Housing Commentary: Section I||Dec 13, 2017||CNRE-1NP|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service September 2017 Housing Commentary: Section II||Dec 12, 2017||CNRE-2NP|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service October 2017 Housing Commentary: Section I||Jan 4, 2018||CNRE-3NP|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service October 2017 Housing Commentary: Section II||Jan 4, 2018||CNRE-4NP|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service November 2017 Housing Commentary: Section I||Jan 25, 2018||CNRE-6|
|The Virginia Tech – U.S. Forest Service November 2017 Housing Commentary: Section II||Jan 25, 2018||CNRE-7|
|2012 Annual Report, Agency 229 - Partners for Progress||Jan 24, 2013||VCE-16|
|2013 Annual Report, Agency 229 - Partners for Progress||Nov 12, 2014||VCE-196|
|2014 Annual Report, Agency 229 - Partners for Progress||Nov 12, 2014||VCE-444|
|2015 Annual Report, Agency 229 — Partners for Progress||Sep 30, 2015||VCE-583NP|